Future Energy and Material Scenarios Based on Decent Living Standards
ディーセントな生活水準に基づく将来のエネルギーと材料シナリオ (AI 翻訳)
Johan Andrés Vélez-Henao, Jan Streeck, Joel Millward-Hopkins, Marlin Arnz, Vivien Fisch-Romito, Kaveri Ashok, Jarmo Kikstra, Narasimha D. Rao
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
ディーセントな生活水準（DLS）フレームワークは、人間の幸福に不可欠な最低限の物的要件を定義し、社会経済的未来の環境影響と人間開発の進展を結び付ける規範的参照点として機能する。本研究は、DLSをすべての人に提供するためのエネルギーと温室効果ガス排出量の定量化をレビューし、不平等削減が貧困撲滅と気候安定目標の同時達成に重要であることを示す。
English
This paper reviews the decent living standards (DLS) framework and its application to quantify energy and GHG emissions required for eradicating poverty. It finds that the energy and emissions needed for meeting basic needs are much smaller than those from affluence beyond DLS, highlighting the importance of inequality reduction for climate stabilization.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
本論文は、基礎的生活水準を満たすためのエネルギー需要とGHG排出を定量化し、富裕層の過剰消費が環境負荷の主要因であることを示唆。日本のGX政策においても、エネルギーアクセスと不平等是正の視点が重要であることを示す。
In the global GX context
This paper provides a normative framework linking poverty eradication to climate goals, relevant for global discussions on just transition and sustainable development. It emphasizes that inequality reduction is a key lever for achieving both social and environmental targets.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Useful for those working on integrated assessment models, sustainable development scenarios, and the energy-poverty nexus.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the importance of addressing inequality in climate policy and can inform national strategies for inclusive decarbonization.
📄 Abstract（原文）
The decent living standards (DLS) framework defines a minimum set of material requirements that are essential for achieving human well-being. Over the past decade, it has served as a normative reference to link the environmental impacts of socioeconomic futures to progress in human development. Studies have applied the DLS framework at national, regional, and global scales to quantify multidimensional poverty, infrastructure, and service requirements in order to eradicate poverty and, in turn, to quantify the energy and materials required to meet these needs. A few studies examine the greenhouse gas (GHG) implications of providing DLS to all in climate futures. Overall, the literature suggests that the energy and GHG emissions implied in closing gaps and sustaining DLS are, and will remain, smaller than the impacts associated with affluence beyond DLS. There are substantial regional variations in resource impacts as a result of differences in climate, population density, and existing provisioning systems. Transport needs are relatively poorly understood, and its quantifications vary the most. The literature reveals the importance of inequality reduction in simultaneously eradicating poverty and achieving climate stabilization goals.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-011226-035354first seen 2026-07-25 04:57:00
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。