バングラデシュにおける公正なエネルギー移行の約束とパラドックス：ガバナンスの欠陥、正義のギャップ、衡平な移行のアーキテクチャ
The promise and paradox of a just energy transition in Bangladesh: Governance deficits, justice gaps, and the architecture of an equitable transition (原題)
Shahana Afrose Chowdhury
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、2050年100%再生可能エネルギー目標と、化石燃料が85%超を占める現実との乖離を「強制的移行の罠」として理論化する。認識・手続き・分配・救済の四柱からなるエネルギー正義枠組みで監査し、全次元での制度的失敗を明示。EUのCBAMとバングラデシュの縫製業（RMG）部門のエネルギー制約の矛盾を指摘し、440万人の労働者への影響を論じる。JETPからの排除を評価し、移行の速度と衡平性に関する政策提言を行う。
English
This paper theorizes Bangladesh's 'compulsory transition trap'—the gap between its 100% renewable goal by 2050 and a system where fossil fuels exceed 85% of electricity. Using a four-pillar energy justice framework, it audits systemic failures across recognition, procedural, distributional, and remedial dimensions. It documents a contradiction between the EU's CBAM and Bangladesh's RMG sector energy constraints, affecting 4.4 million workers, and evaluates exclusion from JETP, offering policy recommendations on transition pace and equity.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本企業のサプライチェーン（特にアパレル）がバングラデシュに依存する中、CBAMと現地のエネルギー制約が調達リスクに直結する。日本政府・企業がJETP支援国として関与する際の教訓を提供する。
In the global GX context
This paper highlights how CBAM and energy justice deficits in a major garment exporter create supply chain risks for global brands. It offers lessons for JETP design and climate finance access, relevant to ISSB/CSRD supply chain disclosure and transition finance discussions.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:途上国における公正な移行の理論枠組みと実証分析の事例を提供する。
🏢実務担当者:バングラデシュのサプライヤーを持つ企業は、CBAM対応とエネルギー制約による調達リスクを理解すべき。
🏛政策担当者:JETPの設計や気候資金アクセス改善に向けた、ガバナンスと衡平性の重要性を示唆する。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Bangladesh confronts an acute and multi-dimensional tension between formal commitments to clean energy transformation and the entrenched structural realities of a fossil-fuel-dependent economy. This paper offers a theoretically grounded and empirically situated analysis of Bangladesh's just energy transition (JET) deficit, conceptualizing the gap between the state's declared ambition of 100% renewable energy by 2050 and an energy system in which fossil fuels account for over 85% of electricity generation and renewables contribute less than 3% of total supply. Drawing on secondary data, policy documents, and a four-pillar energy justice framework encompassing recognition, procedural, distributional, and remedial justice, the study systematically interrogates the structural, institutional, financial, and normative barriers that constitute and reproduce this deficit. The paper advances three original contributions: it theorizes Bangladesh's transition condition as a ‘compulsory transition trap’ in which resource depletion and international trade conditionality drive energy system change in the absence of governance capacity and social protection mechanisms; it applies a disaggregated justice audit to demonstrate systemic failures across all four justice dimensions; and it documents an emerging contradiction between the European Union's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) and Bangladesh's readymade garment (RMG) sector's energy supply constraints, with implications for 4.4 million workers. The paper evaluates Bangladesh's exclusion from the Just Energy Transition Partnership (JETP) architecture and develops evidence-informed policy recommendations addressing both the pace and equity architecture of transition. The analysis demonstrates that Bangladesh's transition deficit is not primarily technological but reflects deeper failures of governance, institutional coordination, climate finance access, and political inclusion.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2026.102153first seen 2026-10-13 04:35:43
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。