gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Subordinated agency and the grafting of sustainable finance regulations in south-east Asia

従属的主体性と東南アジアにおける持続可能な金融規制の接ぎ木 (AI 翻訳)

Apolline Simons, Lena Rethel

International Affairsプレプリント2025-09-01#トランジション・ファイナンスOrigin: Global
DOI: 10.1093/ia/iiaf058
原典: https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiaf058

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、東南アジア諸国がグリーンタクソノミーを開発する過程で、グローバルな金融規範に従属しつつも、独自の社会経済的発展を重視した非ヘゲモニックな主体性を発揮したことを明らかにする。ソフトウェア支援の質的内容分析を用いて、利益最大化を超えた持続可能性の組み込み方を理論化している。

English

This paper examines how Southeast Asian countries, despite subordination in global finance, have exercised non-hegemonic agency in developing green taxonomies that prioritize socio-economic development over profit maximization. Using software-assisted qualitative content analysis, it theorizes 'grafting' as a form of innovation through adaptation to global norms.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本がSSBJやグリーンタクソノミーを検討する際、東南アジアの事例は、国際基準への適合と国内の社会経済的文脈のバランスを取る上で示唆に富む。特に、非ヘゲモニックな主体性という概念は、日本のGX政策立案にも応用可能。

In the global GX context

This paper contributes to global GX discourse by showing how emerging economies can shape sustainable finance regulations despite power asymmetries. It challenges the assumption that global norms (e.g., EU taxonomy) are simply adopted, highlighting the role of local agency in transition finance.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a theoretical framework ('grafting') for studying regulatory innovation in sustainable finance within power-imbalanced global contexts.

🏢実務担当者:Offers insights for corporate sustainability teams operating in Southeast Asia on how local taxonomies may differ from global standards.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights how regulators can adapt global norms to local developmental priorities, relevant for countries designing their own green taxonomies.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Abstract South-east Asia is often overlooked in debates about the rise of Asia in international financial affairs. Not only does the region occupy a subordinated space in global finance, it is also overshadowed in policy debates by the rise of China. Nevertheless, in recognizing regional diversity and emphasizing the duality of economic and ecological transition, south-east Asian countries have sought to claim developmental space in global finance to incorporate sustainability concerns in a distinctive manner. Our case focuses on the development of green taxonomies—classificatory schemes that set out how regulators define sustainable and green investment. We employ the notion of grafting to theorize instances of innovation via adaptation and changes to the source paradigm in the design of financial regulations. Using software-assisted qualitative content analysis, we demonstrate how south-east Asian countries have successfully challenged hegemonic understandings of finance based on profit maximization, emphasizing the importance of socio-economic development. They do so despite considerable pressure to align with global financial norms to further their integration with global markets. As such, the development of sustainable finance in the region is at least partly an instance of non-hegemonic agency in financial norm-making at the levels of both regulation and market practice.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。