gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

A hybrid IoT-Hadoop-blockchain architecture for decentralized MRV and carbon data governance

分散型MRVおよび炭素データガバナンスのためのハイブリッドIoT-Hadoop-ブロックチェーンアーキテクチャ (AI 翻訳)

Jingyuan Ding, Yuan Lu

Frontiers in Climate📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-04-10#開示インフラOrigin: Global経営インパクト: 資金調達対象セクター: cross_sector
DOI: 10.3389/fclim.2026.1776972
原典: https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2026.1776972

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、温室効果ガス排出の測定・報告・検証(MRV)を分散型で実現するため、IoT、Hadoop、ブロックチェーンを統合したアーキテクチャを提案する。カーボンデータを継続的に管理されるデジタル資産として捉え、Hyperledger Fabricによる不変性とDAOベースのガバナンス、トークン化による気候金融との連携を特徴とする。実験結果はデータの完全性と透明性の向上を示している。

English

This paper proposes a hybrid IoT-Hadoop-blockchain architecture for decentralized Measurement, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) of greenhouse gas emissions. It redefines carbon data as a continuously governed digital asset, leveraging Hyperledger Fabric for immutability, DAO-based governance for distributed authority, and tokenization for integration with climate finance. The architecture enhances data integrity and transparency, with potential applications in Web3 and Real-World Asset mechanisms.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本ではSSBJ基準の策定が進み、企業のGHG排出データの信頼性が問われている。本アーキテクチャは、サプライチェーン排出量の分散型MRVやデータ改ざん防止に貢献し得る。また、DAOによるガバナンスは、複数企業間でのデータ共有ルールの設計に示唆を与える。

In the global GX context

Globally, TCFD and ISSB require reliable MRV for climate disclosures. This architecture addresses the need for transparent and tamper-proof carbon data, offering a model for decentralized governance and integration with emerging climate finance instruments. It could strengthen trust in corporate emissions reporting under evolving regulatory frameworks.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a comprehensive architectural blueprint for decentralized MRV systems, integrating blockchain, IoT, and big data for carbon accounting research.

🏢実務担当者:Offers a framework for enhancing data integrity and transparency in corporate GHG reporting, potentially reducing verification costs and improving stakeholder trust.

🏛政策担当者:Illustrates how decentralized governance and cryptographic verification can support regulatory compliance and market-based climate mechanisms.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Accurate, transparent, and scalable Measurement, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) of greenhouse-gas emissions is foundational to credible climate governance, yet prevailing systems remain fragmented, low-frequency, and vulnerable to manipulation. This paper proposes a hybrid IoT–Hadoop–blockchain architecture that reconceptualizes carbon data as a continuously governed digital asset rather than a static compliance artifact. High-frequency operational data are collected through IoT infrastructures, stored and pre-processed in Hadoop for scalability and data sovereignty, and anchored on a Hyperledger Fabric consortium blockchain using Merkle-tree commitments to ensure immutability and traceability. A Carbon Data Interface Standard (CDIS) harmonizes heterogeneous data sources, while Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO)-based governance distributes authority across individual and institutional stakeholders. A Dynamic Authority Selection Mechanism (DASM) aligns participation in the consensus process with verifiable performance, institutionalizing a coopetitive model of data stewardship. The architecture further integrates with a public-chain value layer, enabling tokenization pathways and interoperability with emerging Web3 and Real-World Asset (RWA) climate-finance mechanisms. The results demonstrate how decentralized infrastructure, cryptographic verification, and polycentric governance can jointly improve data integrity, transparency, and market relevance in MRV systems. The paper concludes by outlining empirical pilot pathways and future research directions in AI-assisted verification, dynamic standardization, and climate-linked digital finance.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。