← 論文一覧に戻る

エネルギー併産を伴うバイオ炭炭素除去の経済的実現可能性とインセンティブ設計のモデリングフレームワーク

A Framework for Modeling the Economic Viability of and Incentives Design for Biochar Carbon Removal with Energy Co-production (原題)

Monika Orlowski, H. Bluhm

ETA Florence📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-10-07#CCUS経営インパクト: 資金調達対象セクター: power
DOI: 10.5071/34theubce2026-3cv.8.14
原典: https://doi.org/10.5071/34theubce2026-3cv.8.14

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

バイオ炭炭素除去(BCR)の経済性と政策インセンティブを評価するため、oemofベースのオープンソース最適化フレームワーク「pyromof」を提案。熱需要が連続的に存在する条件下で、合成ガス貯蔵補助金がプラントの柔軟性・収益性に与える影響を検証した。CHP価格を調整しない単独の貯蔵補助金は柔軟性・実現可能性を改善しないことを示した。

English

Introduces pyromof, an open-source oemof-based framework for techno-economic optimization of pyrolysis plant construction and operation under varying policy conditions. A use case assesses how a syngas storage subsidy affects plant flexibility and viability under continuous minimum heat demand. Results show a standalone storage subsidy, without adjusting CHP prices, does not improve flexibility or viability versus plants with only electricity and heat storage.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

ネガティブエミッション技術への政策支援設計は、日本のGX推進やカーボンクレジット制度(J-クレジット等)における炭素除去の扱いを検討する上で参考になる。特に補助金と市場価格の相互作用を定量化する枠組みは、国内の脱炭素投資支援策の設計に示唆を与える。

In the global GX context

As carbon removal gains traction in voluntary and compliance markets (e.g., Article 6, CDR crediting), this framework helps policymakers and investors model how subsidies interact with energy co-product markets. It contributes to the broader debate on designing effective incentives for negative emissions under ISSB/TCFD-aligned transition planning.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides an open-source, flexible modeling framework for techno-economic analysis of biochar carbon removal with energy co-production, enabling policy scenario exploration.

🏢実務担当者:Helps project developers and investors assess the viability of pyrolysis plants under different subsidy and market conditions, particularly regarding storage and CHP flexibility.

🏛政策担当者:Illustrates that standalone storage subsidies may be ineffective without coordinated adjustments to CHP pricing, informing the design of carbon removal incentives.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Biochar carbon removal (BCR) is an emerging negative emissions technology with co-products whose markets are heavily influenced by policies. Techno-economic modeling supports industry decision-making under hypothetical financial and political conditions, while aiding policymakers in designing effective policies. However, existing models are either highly specific to certain plant designs or overly generic. This paper introduces pyromof, a new open-source framework based on oemof, designed for creating economic optimization models for pyrolysis plant construction and operation under various policy conditions. The framework allows integration of components like storage systems and engines, with a focus on flexibility in electricity feed-in. A use case demonstrates its functionality by assessing the impact of a subsidy for syngas storage systems on plant flexibility and viability, assuming continuous minimum heat demand. Results show that a standalone syngas storage subsidy, without adjusting combined heat and power (CHP) plant prices, does not improve flexibility or viability compared to plants with only electricity and heat storage. Future framework developments will incorporate additional policies.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。