BRICS-T経済におけるSDG7・SDG13整合の生態学的移行に向けた地政学リスク・政府規模・環境持続可能性のネクサス
Geopolitical Risk, Government Size and Environmental Sustainability Nexus for SDG 7 and SDG 13 Aligned Ecological Transition in BRICS ‐T Economies (原題)
Anam Ul Haq Ganie, Safia Omer Hapallah Omer, Mohammad Subhan
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
BRICS-T経済の1996〜2023年データを用い、地政学リスクが生態学的フットプリントを増大させ環境持続可能性を損なうことを示した。政府規模の拡大は環境負荷を低減し、地政学的不安定性の悪影響を緩和する。再生可能エネルギー消費は持続可能性を改善し、SDG7・13・16達成には環境ガバナンスと強靭な公共制度が重要と結論づける。
English
Using 1996–2023 data for BRICS-T economies, the study finds geopolitical risk raises ecological footprint and weakens sustainability, while larger government size reduces ecological pressure and moderates the adverse effects of instability. Renewable energy improves sustainability. It concludes that environmental governance and resilient public institutions are key to SDG 7, 13 and 16.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本企業・政策にとって直接の開示規制論点は薄いが、地政学リスクが再エネ調達や脱炭素投資を阻害し得るという視点は、調達リスク管理やサプライチェーン強靭化を議論する日本企業に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Adds emerging-economy evidence to the global debate on how geopolitical instability can stall transition finance and renewable deployment, relevant to ISSB/TCFD discussions on climate-risk governance and institutional resilience.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:地政学リスクと環境持続可能性の計量分析に関心を持つ研究者に、MMQRによる分布別効果の実証枠組みを提供する。
🏢実務担当者:新興国サプライチェーンを持つ企業の調達・カントリーリスク評価に、地政学リスクと再エネ移行の関係という視点を加える。
🏛政策担当者:地政学的不安定下での環境政策において、公共支出と制度の役割を重視すべきという政策的示唆を提供する。
📄 Abstract（原文）
ABSTRACT Growing geopolitical uncertainty and ecological degradation have become major barriers to environmental sustainability and sustainable development, particularly, in emerging economies facing rising energy insecurity and institutional challenges. Geopolitical tensions may undermine sustainability transitions by discouraging green investment, disrupting renewable energy systems and increasing reliance on carbon‐intensive energy sources. This study examines the impact of geopolitical risk on environmental sustainability and investigates whether government size moderates the environmental consequences of geopolitical instability in BRICS‐T economies over the period 1996–2023. Ecological footprint is employed as a comprehensive measure of environmental sustainability, while the Method of Moments Quantile Regression approach is used to capture heterogeneous effects across different ecological pressure regimes. The findings reveal that geopolitical risk increases ecological footprint, thereby weakening environmental sustainability. In contrast, government size reduces ecological pressure, indicating that stronger public sector involvement contributes positively to sustainability outcomes. The interaction analysis further demonstrates that government size mitigates the adverse environmental effects associated with geopolitical instability across the conditional distribution of ecological footprint. In addition, renewable energy consumption improves environmental sustainability, while economic growth and trade openness generally contribute to reducing ecological degradation. The study contributes to the sustainable development literature by demonstrating that government size plays a critical role in mitigating the adverse environmental consequences of geopolitical uncertainty through sustainability‐oriented public expenditure. The findings highlight the importance of renewable energy transition, environmental governance and resilient public institutions for supporting sustainable development and achieving SDG 7, SDG 13 and SDG 16 in emerging economies facing rising geopolitical instability.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.71735first seen 2026-10-19 04:57:15
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。