gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Smart-eco farming villages for low carbon sustainability: Evidence from an Indonesian living lab

低炭素持続可能性のためのスマートエコ農業村:インドネシアのリビングラボからのエビデンス (AI 翻訳)

Ilham Ainuddin, Bulan Prabawani, Sudharto P. Hadi, Kadek Ardhika Widya Kresna, Anis Qomariah

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-05-19#その他
DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202671208003/pdf
原典: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202671208003/pdf

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、インドネシア・東ジャワのTawangargoスマートエコ農業村(TAMENG)プログラムの事例を報告する。CSR支援によるリビングラボで、園芸残渣の循環管理(液体有機肥料・飼料化)と精密灌漑を導入。年間1,095トンの有機残渣処理、39.4トンのPOC生産、555 tCO2-e/年の排出削減、灌漑水量65%削減を達成。クロスグループプラットフォームとリソースセンターが普及を支えた。

English

This paper reports monitored evidence from the Tawangargo Smart-Eco Farming Village (TAMENG) program in East Java, Indonesia, a CSR-supported community living lab. Two intervention packages were implemented: circular management of horticultural residues into liquid organic fertilizer and livestock feed, and precision irrigation. Results show 1,095 tons of organic residues processed annually, 39.4 tons/year of POC, an estimated mitigation of 555 tCO2-e/year, and water-use reductions up to 65%. Governance mechanisms including a cross-group platform and a resource center sustained adoption.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

本論文はインドネシアの事例だが、日本の農業分野でのGX(温室効果ガス削減・資源循環)や、日本企業の海外CSR活動の参考になる可能性がある。特に、小規模農家向けの脱炭素介入とその効果測定方法は、日本国内の農業政策やJ-クレジット制度にも示唆を与えうる。

In the global GX context

This paper offers a transparent, community-based living lab approach to agricultural decarbonization, relevant to global CSA and circular economy efforts. It provides detailed emission estimates and water savings that can inform similar programs in developing countries, filling a gap in empirical evidence for smallholder agriculture. The governance model (cross-group platform, resource center) is valuable for scaling.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Demonstrates a living lab methodology for agricultural decarbonization with conservative emission accounting, useful for future intervention studies.

🏢実務担当者:Provides a replicable model for CSR or development projects combining circular agriculture and water efficiency with clear emission impacts.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights the potential for village-scale programs to contribute to national climate goals, with insights on governance and monitoring.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Decarbonizing smallholder agriculture rarely hinges on a single technology; it depends on whether farmers can reorganize everyday routines without increasing production risk. We report monitored evidence from the Tawangargo Smart-Eco Farming Village (TAMENG) program in East Java, Indonesia (2022-2026), a CSR-supported community living lab initiated by PT Petrokimia Gresik. Using an embedded qualitative case study complemented by descriptive monitoring records, we trace two linked intervention packages: (i) circular management of horticultural residues into liquid organic fertilizer (POC) and livestock feed concentrate (wafer) and (ii) precision irrigation (drip systems and growth-stage scheduling). Program logs indicate that = 1,095 tons of organic residues are processed annually, yielding =39.4 tons/year of POC and supporting a program- estimated mitigation of =555 tCO2-e/year through avoided unmanaged decomposition and partial substitution of upstream inputs. Irrigation pilots report water-use reductions up to 65%, with practical co-benefits for pumping time and input-related energy demand. We also describe the governance mechanisms that sustained adoption Agronova Vision as a cross-group platform and a Resource Center (P4S Ngudi Kaweruh) that anchors training, quality assurance, and replication. The case suggests that village-scale CSA living labs can connect solid-waste resource utilization with water efficiency and livelihood resilience, while keeping emissions claims transparent and conservative.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。