Striking a chord or missing the beat: Citizen perspectives on narrative resonance and value alignment in the Dutch energy transition
共鳴を奏でるか、それとも拍子を外すか：オランダのエネルギー転換における市民の視点から見たナラティブの共鳴と価値の整合性 (AI 翻訳)
Romée Lammers, Sikke R. Jansma, Bernard P. Veldkamp, Matthias de Visser, Jordy F. Gosselt
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
オランダの市民を対象とした定性的研究により、エネルギー転換のナラティブに対する共鳴の障壁を特定。過度に専門的な言葉遣い、不公平な負担配分、一貫性のない政策メッセージ、再生可能技術への懐疑が主な障壁である。参加者は、簡略化された言語、公平な負担、明確な政策方向性、透明性のあるエビデンスを提案した。価値観に敏感なコミュニケーションの必要性を強調。
English
This qualitative study identifies four barriers to narrative resonance in the Dutch energy transition: overly technical language, perceived unfairness in responsibility distribution, inconsistent policy messaging, and skepticism toward renewable technologies. Participants proposed simplified language, equitable burden-sharing, clear policy directions, and transparent evidence. The study emphasizes the need for value-sensitive communication to support public engagement in energy transitions.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本のエネルギー転換でも、市民の価値観とナラティブの一致が重要。本研究成果は、日本における地域レベルでのエネルギー政策やコミュニケーション戦略に示唆を与える。特に、負担の公平性や技術への信頼醸成に役立つ。
In the global GX context
This paper underscores the importance of aligning energy transition narratives with citizen values globally. For countries like the Netherlands and Japan, it highlights barriers such as technical jargon and policy inconsistency, offering actionable insights for inclusive communication strategies.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Contributes to understanding narrative resonance mechanisms in energy transitions, linking values to engagement barriers.
🏢実務担当者:Offers concrete recommendations for designing communication strategies that address common resonance barriers like technical language and fairness.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need for equitable burden-sharing and consistent policy messaging to improve public engagement with energy transition policies.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Despite ambitious emission reduction policies, many Dutch citizens remain disconnected from the national energy transition, limiting necessary civic engagement. While effective narration has been shown to matter for public resonance with the energy transition, little research addresses how resonance barriers may be shaped by citizens' own perceptions. To bridge this gap, this qualitative study analyzed value-sensitive interviews with a cross-section of Dutch citizenry. Results revealed four resonance barriers: overly technical language, perceived unfairness in responsibility distribution, inconsistent policy messaging, and skepticism toward renewable technologies. These barriers appeared to reflect tensions between narrative congruence, coherence, narrator trustworthiness, and audience values, particularly universalism, stimulation, security, achievement, and self-direction. Participants proposed simplified language, equitable burden-sharing, clear policy directions, and transparent renewable energy evidence as solutions aligned with their values. By highlighting how audience values may shape narrative resonance, this study emphasizes the need for more value-sensitive approaches to communication for supporting public engagement with the energy transition.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2026.101166first seen 2026-07-19 04:45:28
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。