インドにおける炭素市場研究の動向：計量書誌学的分析（1999–2025年）
Research Trends of Carbon Market Research in India: A Bibliometric Analysis (1999–2025) (原題)
Sani Umar Muhammad, S. Waghmare, Surrender Singh Siwach, Musa Muhammad Yusuf, Mudassir Saad Ubale, AliyuBusa Muhammad
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
1999〜2025年のインド炭素市場研究864件をDimensionsから抽出し、RのBiblioshinyで計量書誌分析を実施。年間生産量は2025年に162件へ急増し、2023〜25年で累積の38.4%を占める。共語ネットワークは林業、炭素隔離・モニタリング、排出等の5クラスターを形成し、2024〜25年に気候変動と林業テーマが統合。インド・米国が最強の二国間協力（24件）で、MRVニーズへの示唆を提示。
English
A bibliometric analysis of 864 Indian carbon market documents (1999–2025) using R's Biblioshiny. Annual output surged to 162 in 2025, with 38.4% of cumulative output from 2023–25. Co-word networks reveal five clusters (forestry, carbon sequestration/monitoring, emissions, etc.), with climate-change and forestry themes merging in 2024–25. India–USA is the strongest collaboration (24 co-authored docs). Findings inform MRV needs for India's compliance carbon market.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
インドの炭素市場研究動向は、日本がGXリーグやカーボンクレジット市場（JCM含む）を通じてアジアの炭素市場連携を進める上で参考になる。特にMRV体制の研究基盤に関する示唆は、日本の排出量取引制度設計や二国間クレジット制度の運用に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
This paper maps India's carbon market research base, offering insights for global carbon market development under Article 6 and the emerging compliance markets in Asia. It highlights MRV research gaps that are relevant to ISSB/TCFD-aligned disclosure and carbon credit integrity debates worldwide.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:インド炭素市場研究のテーマ構造と国際協力ネットワークを把握できる。
🏢実務担当者:インドの炭素市場・MRV関連の研究動向を踏まえ、現地プロジェクトやクレジット調達の情報源として活用可能。
🏛政策担当者:インドの炭素信用取引スキーム（CCTS）実施に向けた研究基盤の強みと不足領域を理解する材料になる。
📄 Abstract（原文）
The present study analyses the growth, conceptual structure, thematic evolution, and international collaboration of carbon market research in India from 1999 to 2025. A total of 864 documents retrieved from Dimensions were retained for analysis. Bibliometric analysis was performed using the Biblioshiny interface in R to compute annual scientific production, average citations per year, the most relevant sources, source local impact, country scientific production, Bradford's Law, co-word networks, thematic mapping, factorial analysis, thematic evolution, and international collaboration networks. The results show a marked increase in annual production, from single digits in the early 2000s to 162 documents in 2025, with 38.4% of the cumulative output produced from 2023 to 2025. Energy Policy was the leading peer-reviewed source by local impact (h-index = 22; 1,483 citations), while SSRN Electronic Journal had the highest volume (50 documents; 233 citations). Kumar A. had the highest number of articles, whereas Tiwari G. had the highest number of citations across all articles. The co-word network and thematic map revealed five conceptual clusters covering forestry, carbon sequestration and monitoring, general carbon or conservation, emissions, and a smaller solar-energy theme. Thematic evolution revealed a merger of the climate-change and forestry themes in 2024–2025, resulting in the emergence of a carbon-sequestration/environmental-monitoring theme. The most central nodes in the collaboration network were India and the USA, with India–USA representing the strongest bilateral collaboration (24 co-authored documents), followed by India–Germany and India–China (10 each). These patterns reveal thematic areas within India's research base that may help address the monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV) needs of its compliance carbon market. Continued investment in India's local research capacity and international research cooperation, particularly with the USA and Germany, may support the successful implementation of the Carbon Credit Trading Scheme.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2026/v16i95679first seen 2026-09-19 05:25:23 · last seen 2026-09-21 04:58:33
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。