森林からコーヒー栽培（Coffea arabica）への転換はペルー・アマゾンにおける有機炭素隔離支払いを大幅に減少させる
Converting forests to coffee cultivation (Coffea arabica) significantly reduces organic carbon sequestration payments in the Peruvian Amazon (原題)
Nery Gaona-Jiménez, Betsabeth Teresa Padilla-Macedo, Walter Saucedo Vega, Juan Carlos Ludeña-Cardenas, Milagros Zevallos Ruiz, Caleb Ríos Vargas, Enrique Napoleón Martínez Quiroz, Jorge Fernando Gutiérrez López, Jorge Saavedra-Ramírez, Juan C. Tuesta-Hidalgo, Oscar A. Tuesta-Hidalgo, Josias J. Hidalgo Tuesta, Roger Ricardo Rengifo Amasifen, Andrés Alejandro Juárez Rivero, Uriel Aldava Pardave, Karina M. Ordoñez-Ruiz
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
ペルー・アマゾンで一次林・コーヒー単作・アグロフォレストリー等を比較し、炭素貯留と生物多様性、炭素隔離の経済価値を評価した。一次林は地上133.74 t/ha・地下40.12 t/ha（CO2換算約638 t/ha）と最大の貯留能を示し、保全価値は約949.52 USD/haと推計された。アグロフォレストリーは単作より環境性能が高く、森林保全と持続的農業が気候緩和に重要と結論づける。
English
This study compares primary forest, coffee monoculture, coffee agroforestry, and Inga-based systems in the Peruvian Amazon for biodiversity, carbon storage, and carbon-sequestration value. Primary forest stored the most carbon (~133.74 t/ha aboveground, 40.12 t/ha belowground, ~638 t CO2/ha), with conservation valued at ~USD 949.52/ha, while conversion to agriculture caused large carbon-benefit losses. Agroforestry outperformed monoculture, supporting forest conservation and sustainable practices for climate mitigation.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本企業のGX文脈では直接の制度接点は薄いが、Scope 3の土地利用・農業由来排出や自然関連財務情報（TNFD）を検討する際、農産物サプライチェーンの炭素・生物多様性リスク評価の参考事例となる。
In the global GX context
For global disclosure scholarship, this offers empirical land-use carbon and biodiversity data relevant to TNFD, SBTN, and Scope 3 land-sector accounting, and illustrates how carbon-sequestration valuation can inform nature-positive transition finance in tropical commodity supply chains.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:熱帯農業転換が炭素貯留と経済価値に与える影響を定量化した実証データを提供する。
🏢実務担当者:コーヒー等農産物調達における土地利用由来の炭素・生物多様性リスク評価の基礎情報として活用できる。
🏛政策担当者:森林保全とアグロフォレストリー推進の炭素・経済的便益を示し、土地利用政策や炭素支払い制度設計の根拠となる。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Introduction The Peruvian Amazon has experienced extensive forest loss, reducing its capacity to store carbon and provide important climate-related benefits. This study evaluated how the conversion of forests into Coffea arabica cultivation affects biodiversity, carbon storage, and the economic value associated with carbon sequestration. Methods Different land-use systems, including primary forests, coffee monocultures, coffee agroforestry systems, and Inga-based systems, were compared. Results The results showed that primary forests had the highest biodiversity and carbon storage capacity, with approximately 133.74 t ha −1 of aboveground carbon and 40.12 t ha −1 of underground carbon, equivalent to around 638.05 t ha −1 of CO 2 . Coffee agroforestry systems showed better environmental performance than coffee monocultures, maintaining higher biodiversity and carbon storage capacity. The economic assessment indicated that primary forest conservation reached an estimated value of approximately USD 949.52 per hectare, while forest conversion to agricultural systems generated significant losses in carbon-related benefits. Discussion These findings highlight the importance of conserving native forests and promoting sustainable agroforestry practices as strategies for climate change mitigation, biodiversity conservation, and the maintenance of ecosystem services in the Peruvian Amazon. In Peru, this information would help conserve forests and mitigate climate change through more sustainable environmental decisions.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3389/frevc.2026.1905945first seen 2026-09-10 04:39:03
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。