← 論文一覧に戻る

Spatially-explicit footprints of agricultural commodities: Mapping carbon emissions embodied in Brazil's soy exports

農産物の空間明示的フットプリント:ブラジルの大豆輸出に内在する炭素排出のマッピング (AI 翻訳)

Neus Escobar, E. Jorge Tizado, Erasmus K. H. J. zu Ermgassen, Pernilla Löfgren, Jan Börner, Javier Godar

Global Environmental Change📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2020-05-01#Scope 3Origin: Global経営インパクト: 調達リスク対象セクター: agriculture
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102067
原典: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102067
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、LCAと物理的貿易フロー分析を統合し、ブラジルの大豆輸出に伴うGHG排出量を空間明示的に推定した。2010~2015年の約9万件の貿易フローを分析し、産地や輸入国による炭素フットプリントの大きなばらつきを明らかにした。特にMATOPIBA州とパラ州からの輸入はブラジル平均の最大6倍の排出を伴い、EUは中国より高い排出原単位を示した。総排出量は223.46 Mtで、半分以上を中国が輸入した。

English

This paper integrates LCA with physical trade flow analysis to spatially explicitly estimate GHG emissions from Brazilian soy exports. Analyzing ~90,000 trade flows from 2010-2015, it reveals large variability in carbon footprints across sourcing regions and importing countries. Imports from MATOPIBA and Pará entail up to six times higher emissions per unit than the Brazilian average. The EU shows a higher footprint (0.77 t/t) than China (0.67 t/t) due to embodied deforestation. Total emissions are 223.46 Mt, with China importing over half.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本企業にとって、輸入農産物のScope3排出量算定は重要課題であり、本論文の空間明示的な手法はサプライチェーン排出量の精緻化に示唆を与える。また、SSBJ開示やサプライチェーン排出量の削減目標設定に際し、産地別の排出原単位を考慮した調達戦略の重要性を示す。

In the global GX context

This paper provides a methodological advance for spatially explicit Scope 3 accounting, relevant to global disclosure frameworks like TCFD and ISSB that require supply chain emissions reporting. It highlights the importance of considering regional variability in emissions for accurate carbon footprinting and informs debates on producer vs. consumer responsibility in international trade.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a bottom-up approach integrating LCA with trade flow analysis for spatially explicit carbon footprints, useful for improving Scope 3 accounting methods.

🏢実務担当者:Offers insights for companies sourcing agricultural commodities to identify high-emission sourcing regions and adjust procurement strategies to reduce Scope 3 emissions.

🏛政策担当者:Informs policy on trade-related emissions and deforestation, supporting due diligence regulations like the EU Deforestation Regulation.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Reliable estimates of carbon and other environmental footprints of agricultural commodities require capturing a large diversity of conditions along global supply chains. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) faces limitations when it comes to addressing spatial and temporal variability in production, transportation and manufacturing systems. We present a bottom-up approach for quantifying the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions embedded in the production and trade of agricultural products with a high spatial resolution, by means of the integration of LCA principles with enhanced physical trade flow analysis. Our approach estimates the carbon footprint (as tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalents per tonne of product) of Brazilian soy exports over the period 2010–2015 based on ~90,000 individual traded flows of beans, oil and protein cake identified from the municipality of origin through international markets. Soy is the most traded agricultural commodity in the world and the main agricultural export crop in Brazil, where it is associated with significant environmental impacts. We detect an extremely large spatial variability in carbon emissions across sourcing areas, countries of import, and sub-stages throughout the supply chain. The largest carbon footprints are associated with municipalities across the MATOPIBA states and Pará, where soy is directly linked to natural vegetation loss. Importing soy from the aforementioned states entailed up to six times greater emissions per unit of product than the Brazilian average (0.69 t t−1). The European Union (EU) had the largest carbon footprint (0.77 t t−1) due to a larger share of emissions from embodied deforestation than for instance in China (0.67 t t−1), the largest soy importer. Total GHG emissions from Brazilian soy exports in 2010–2015 are estimated at 223.46 Mt, of which more than half were imported by China although the EU imported greater emissions from deforestation in absolute terms. Our approach contributes data for enhanced environmental stewardship across supply chains at the local, regional, national and international scales, while informing the debate on global responsibility for the impacts of agricultural production and trade.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。