gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Towards sustainable rail mobility: emission reduction strategies for modern rail operations

持続可能な鉄道モビリティに向けて:現代の鉄道運営における排出削減戦略 (AI 翻訳)

Concettina Marino, Marinella Giunta

Environmental engineering📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-05-11#エネルギー転換Origin: EU
DOI: 10.3846/enviro.2026.1509
原典: https://doi.org/10.3846/enviro.2026.1509

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、鉄道運行におけるディーゼル機関車からの排出削減を目的に、電化、ハイブリッド、バイオ燃料(HVO等)、水素燃料など複数の脱炭素戦略を比較評価する手法を開発・適用。Well-to-Wheel(WTW)分析を通じて、再生可能燃料は気候影響を大幅に軽減できる一方、水素システムは長期的な脱炭素化に有望だが、生産エネルギーやインフラ整備に課題があることを示す。

English

This paper develops and applies a procedure to compare the environmental burdens of conventional diesel traction with innovative propulsion and fuel solutions (electrification, hybrid, biofuels like HVO, hydrogen) for railway operations. Using a Well-to-Wheel (WTW) assessment, it finds that renewable fuels substantially mitigate climate impact, while hydrogen offers deep decarbonization potential but faces challenges in production energy, storage, and infrastructure.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本鉄道は既に高い電化率を誇るが、非電化路線でのディーゼル代替や水素燃料の導入検討に本論文のWTW評価手法が参考となる。特に、SSBJやGX基本方針における運輸部門の排出削減策として、バイオ燃料や水素のライフサイクル評価の枠組みを提供する。

In the global GX context

This paper provides a practical Well-to-Wheel methodology for comparing rail decarbonization options, relevant for global transport emission reduction strategies. Its insights on hydrogen and biofuels are valuable as policymakers and rail operators align with ISSB and CSRD climate targets, though the Italian context may limit direct transferability.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a comparative WTW assessment framework for rail propulsion technologies that can be adapted for other transport modes or regional contexts.

🏢実務担当者:Rail operators can use the methodology to evaluate fuel-switching options (biofuels, hydrogen) and prioritize investments in electrification or alternative fuels.

🏛政策担当者:Offers evidence on lifecycle emissions of rail decarbonization strategies, supporting regulatory decisions on emission standards and fuel mandates.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Railway systems represent a cornerstone of sustainable transportation, providing an environmentally efficient means of moving both people and goods. Their ability to deliver high transport capacity with comparatively low greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, combined with their contribution to reducing road congestion, positions rail as a key pillar of modern low-carbon mobility. The ongoing electrification of rail networks further enhances these benefits by enabling the use of renewable electricity along increasingly extensive corridors. However, despite these advancements, diesel locomotives, still essential for shunting operations, regional services, and non-electrified routes, remain a significant source of environmental impacts. The resulting emissions negatively affect air quality and pose health and climate change concerns, particularly in densely populated or high-traffic railway areas. To meet tightening emission standards, the rail sector is advancing multiple decarbonization strategies, including full electrification, hybrid propulsion technologies, and the adoption of low-carbon fuels. Among these, advanced biofuels, such as biodiesel and Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil (HVO) together with hydrogen used in fuel cell or combustion-based systems, are emerging as the most promising options. Building on established methodologies for assessing rail energy use and emissions, this study develops and applies a procedure for comparing the environmental burdens of conventional diesel traction with those associated with innovative propulsion and fuel solutions across a range of railway operations. The findings confirm that renewable fuels can substantially mitigate the climate impact of rail activities, while hydrogen-powered systems offer significant potential for deep and long-term decarbonization, particularly when supported by renewable energy sources. Nonetheless, the transition to hydrogen remains challenging due to the high energy requirements of its production, the need for dedicated storage and refuelling infrastructure, and uncertainties linked to large-scale deployment. These factors highlight the necessity of a comprehensive Well-to-Wheel (WTW) assessment to fully evaluate the environmental performance of emerging alternatives and ensure that their adoption results in genuine sustainability gains.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。