Awareness–Action and Policy Acceptability in Mitigating Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Key Stakeholders in Germany's Cattle Dairy and Meat Chains
温室効果ガス排出削減における認識と行動のギャップと政策受容性：ドイツの酪農・食肉チェーンの主要ステークホルダー (AI 翻訳)
Karen Arcia, Livia Cerini, Stephan von Cramon‐Taubadel
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、ドイツの酪農・食肉チェーンにおける温室効果ガス排出削減の認識と行動のギャップを体系的にレビューし、統合フレームワークを提示する。生産者、消費者、規制当局、影響力者（メディア・シンクタンク等）の4つのステークホルダーグループ間で障壁と進展に大きな格差があることを明らかにし、20の排出削減政策の受容性を評価する。食肉課税などの議論のある政策は依然として低い支持にとどまり、構造的制約とフレーミングが政策受容性の実装に影響することを示す。
English
This paper presents a systematic literature review and synthesis framework on the awareness-action gap and policy acceptability for GHG mitigation in Germany's dairy and meat supply chains. It identifies disparities among producers, consumers, regulators, and influencers (media, think tanks), and assesses acceptability of 20 mitigation policies. Findings show that fragmented preferences, lack of enforceable mechanisms for mid-chain actors, and weak institutional pathways constrain policy uptake. Debated measures like meat taxation face low support across stakeholders.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でも畜産由来の温室効果ガス排出削減が政策課題となる中、本論文のステークホルダー分析と政策受容性評価の枠組みは、日本のGX政策立案に示唆を与える。特に、生産者と消費者の行動変容を促す政策設計において、認識と行動のギャップを埋める方策を検討する際に参考となる。
In the global GX context
This study contributes to global climate policy scholarship by empirically examining the awareness-action gap and policy acceptability across multiple stakeholders in a hard-to-abate agricultural sector. Its synthesis framework integrating behavioral economics, social psychology, and environmental policy is transferable to other countries and sectors facing similar decarbonization challenges.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a comprehensive framework for analyzing stakeholder behavior and policy acceptability in agricultural GHG mitigation, useful for future comparative studies.
🏢実務担当者:Offers insights for supply chain managers and agri-food companies on stakeholder barriers and effective policy engagement strategies.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights structural constraints (fragmented preferences, weak enforcement) that must be addressed to increase policy uptake in livestock sectors.
📄 Abstract（原文）
ABSTRACT This paper presents a systematic literature review and targeted searches to define a synthesis framework mapping the awareness–action gap, progression along the awareness–action continuum and policy acceptability in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions mitigation among key stakeholders in Germany's cattle dairy and meat chains. The awareness–action gap results from barriers that prevent stakeholders from translating climate awareness into action, whereas progression reflects how far different stakeholder groups have advanced from awareness to action. Previous studies often focus on single stakeholder groups, individual policies or general national trends, but seldom examine how different stakeholders stagnate or progress from awareness to action or how policy acceptability can support this transition. Our synthesis framework integrates concepts and indicators from behavioural economics, social psychology and environmental policy to address these issues. We find strong disparities in four stakeholder groups regarding barriers to act. Producers face misaligned incentives and resource constraints. Consumers are hindered by cultural norms and weak market signals. Regulators struggle with fragmented policies and political hesitancy. Finally, influencers, which we define as entities such as media and think tanks that boost public discourse, amplify inconsistent narratives that impede coordinated action. We also assess the acceptability of 20 GHG mitigation policies for producers and consumers. For meat taxation, we analyse acceptability for two additional stakeholders: policymakers and social organisations. Three structural factors constrain policy uptake: fragmented stakeholder preferences, a lack of enforceable mechanisms for mid‐chain actors and weak institutional pathways to translate preferences into regulation. While some policies have higher acceptability, debated measures such as meat taxation still face low support across stakeholders. This illustrates how framing, layered atop structural constraints, ultimately shapes whether acceptability translates into implementation.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.70102first seen 2026-05-05 19:14:00
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。