Financing green innovation strategy: A review of corporate green bond issuance
グリーンイノベーション戦略への資金調達：企業グリーンボンド発行に関するレビュー (AI 翻訳)
Min Liu, Mohd Hasimi Yaacob, Noor Maimun Abdul Wahab
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本レビューは、グリーンボンドが企業のグリーンイノベーション（R&D投資、特許出願、資源効率など）に与える正の影響を体系的に整理。セクターや地域による差異を指摘し、第三者認証と規制の重要性を強調。政策立案者や投資家に示唆を与える。
English
This systematic review examines how corporate green bond issuance drives green innovation (R&D, patents, resource efficiency), highlighting sectoral and regional disparities and the critical role of third-party certification and regulation to mitigate greenwashing. Offers insights for policymakers and investors.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではグリーンボンドの国内規格やSSBJの枠組みが整備されつつある。本稿の知見は、グリーンボンドの発行が真のイノベーションにつながる条件（認証の重要性）を示しており、日本の市場関係者や規制当局がグリーンボンドの質を高める参考になる。
In the global GX context
This paper consolidates global evidence on the innovation impact of green bonds, supporting the use of proceeds frameworks under ICMA and ISSB standards. It underscores the need for robust certification to ensure credibility in climate finance markets, a key issue for TCFD/ISSB-aligned disclosure.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a structured overview of the green bond–green innovation link, identifying research gaps and sectoral patterns.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights that green bond issuance can enhance corporate innovation outcomes, but certification and transparency are critical for credibility.
🏛政策担当者:Emphasizes the necessity of regulatory frameworks and third-party verification to prevent greenwashing and maximize green bond effectiveness.
📄 Abstract（原文）
The growing urgency of climate change has intensified interest in green finance, particularly green bonds, as mechanisms for financing environmentally sustainable projects. This study aims to examine the impact of corporate green bond issuance on green innovation outcomes, addressing a notable gap in existing literature regarding sectoral variations in this relationship. Employing a systematic literature review (SLR) approach guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework, 32 peer-reviewed studies published between 2010 and 2024 were screened from Scopus, Web of Science (WoS), and Google Scholar. Additionally, bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer and Bibliometrix was conducted to map research trends, co-authorship networks, and keyword co-occurrences. The findings reveal that green bonds exert a positive impact on green innovation, particularly through channels such as research and development (R&D) investment, green patent filings, and resource efficiency improvements (Lin et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2022). However, significant sectoral and regional disparities were identified, with utilities and developed economies dominating issuance while manufacturing remains underexplored. The study concludes that third-party certification and regulatory frameworks are essential to mitigate greenwashing risks. These insights hold relevance for policymakers, investors, and researchers seeking to optimize green bond mechanisms for sustainable development.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv7i2art4first seen 2026-05-15 21:04:04
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。