オンサイト水素製造の技術経済的実現可能性：オランダとオーストラリアの比較研究
Technoeconomic Viability of On-Farm Hydrogen Production: A Comparative Study of the Netherlands and Australia (原題)
Beau Broen, Tahereh Hosseini, Jan Bekkering, Nawshad Haque
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
オランダとオーストラリアの農場におけるオフグリッド水素製造の技術経済性を比較。オランダの風力・太陽光の相補性が高いシステムではLCOHが8.5 USD/kg、オーストラリアの酪農では需要変動が大きく36.2 USD/kgと高コスト。需要側管理の重要性を示す。
English
This study compares technoeconomic feasibility of off-grid on-farm hydrogen production in the Netherlands and Australia. The Dutch system achieves LCOH of 8.5 USD/kg due to complementary wind-solar resources, while the Australian dairy farm faces high costs (36.2 USD/kg) due to demand spikes and higher component costs. Demand-side management is crucial.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では農山漁村での再エネ導入と水素利用が注目されており、本研究成果は農場単位での水素製造の経済性評価に示唆を与える。国内の農業分野での脱炭素施策や地域分散型エネルギーシステムの設計に参考になる。
In the global GX context
This study provides comparative technoeconomic insights for green hydrogen production in agricultural settings, relevant to global efforts to decarbonize hard-to-abate sectors. It highlights the importance of demand profiles and supply chain maturity, informing policy and investment decisions for distributed hydrogen systems.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a comparative technoeconomic framework for on-farm hydrogen production, highlighting the impact of demand profiles and supply chain maturity on LCOH.
🏢実務担当者:Offers insights for agricultural businesses considering hydrogen investments, emphasizing the need for demand-side management and local supply chain development.
🏛政策担当者:Informs policy on supporting green hydrogen in agriculture, noting the cost disparities due to demand patterns and market maturity.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Abstract Decarbonizing the energy system requires new applications for green hydrogen produced via electrolysis, especially in high-emission sectors. This study investigates the technoeconomic feasibility of off-grid on-farm hydrogen production integrated with intermittent renewables in Australia and the Netherlands, focusing on how diverse farming activities influence energy demand and system economics. Energy demand profiles from two commercial case studies, an arable farm in Mensingeweer, Netherlands, and a dairy farm in Tasmania, Australia, reveal a profound divergence in economic performance driven by farm-specific net load profiles and localized supply chain maturity. The optimized Dutch system, benefiting from a highly complementary wind-solar resource mix, achieves a Levelized Cost of Hydrogen (LCOH) of 8.5 USD/kg (€7.75/kg). In contrast, the intense, non-smooth demand spikes characteristic of the studied Australian dairy operation require a massive energy buffer, resulting in a substantially higher baseline optimized LCOH of 36.2 USD/kg (AU$54.87/kg). This variation is attributed to differences in farm-specific energy demand profiles, influencing the required hydrogen storage capacity. Furthermore, system component costs were around 66% higher in the Australian market. The analysis underscores the need for demand-side management strategies to optimize the storage capacity and reduce LCOH.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6c00610first seen 2026-08-23 04:39:50
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。