gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Carbon Neutrality Management and Firm Risk

カーボンニュートラル経営と企業リスク (AI 翻訳)

Junyao Gong

Highlights in Business, Economics and Management📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-06-08#気候金融Origin: CN
DOI: 10.54097/bhkfxz39
原典: https://doi.org/10.54097/bhkfxz39
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

中国A株上場企業のデータを用いて、カーボンニュートラル経営が企業リスクを低減することを実証。資金調達制約の緩和がメカニズムとして働く。監査品質や機関投資家保有比率が低い企業で効果が顕著。

English

Using Chinese A-share listed company data, this paper finds that corporate carbon neutrality management significantly reduces firm risk by alleviating financing constraints. The effect is stronger for firms with lower audit quality and institutional ownership.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本でも2050年カーボンニュートラル目標のもと、企業のカーボンニュートラル経営が注目されている。本論文の資金調達制約緩和を通じたリスク低減のメカニズムは、日本のグリーンファイナンス政策や企業のリスク管理に示唆を与える。

In the global GX context

This study provides empirical evidence from China that carbon neutrality management reduces firm risk by easing financing constraints, adding to global understanding of how climate strategies affect corporate finance. It is particularly relevant for emerging markets and for integrating carbon management into risk assessment.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides robust empirical evidence on the financial benefits of carbon neutrality management, with implications for climate finance literature.

🏢実務担当者:Shows that carbon neutrality management can lower risk by improving access to financing; relevant for corporate sustainability reporting and investor relations.

🏛政策担当者:Supports the case for policies that encourage carbon neutrality management as a risk reduction tool; useful for green finance guidelines.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Under the backdrop of the 'dual carbon' goals, carbon neutrality has become a critical strategy for firms to address climate change and achieve sustainable development, with its impact on corporate risk attracting increasing attention. Using data from Chinese A-share listed companies on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges from 2018 to 2022, this paper empirically examines the impact of corporate carbon neutrality management on firm risk and its underlying mechanisms through multiple regression models. The findings reveal that corporate carbon neutrality management significantly reduces firm risk, and this conclusion remains robust across a series of robustness checks, including alternative risk measurement indicators, replacement of the core explanatory variable, and controlling for endogeneity issues. Heterogeneity analysis demonstrates that the risk-reducing effect of carbon neutrality management is more pronounced in firms with lower audit quality and lower institutional investor ownership, suggesting that carbon neutrality management plays a more critical role in signaling and governance in firms characterized by higher information asymmetry and relatively weaker external monitoring. Mechanism analysis indicates that corporate carbon neutrality management reduces firm risk by alleviating financing constraints. Specifically, the positive signals conveyed by carbon neutrality management reduce the degree of information asymmetry, enabling firms to obtain external funding support at lower costs, thereby enhancing resource allocation capabilities, improving operational efficiency, and ultimately reducing firm risk. These results are consistent with the theoretical expectation that carbon neutrality management reduces corporate information asymmetry, mitigates financing constraints, and consequently lowers firm risk. The findings of this paper not only enrich the literature on the economic consequences of carbon neutrality management but also provide important theoretical foundations and practical implications for firms implementing carbon neutrality strategies, enhancing risk management capabilities, and for governments refining green finance policies.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。