gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Green Bonds and Sustainable Investing: Trends, Challenges, and Future Outlook

グリーンボンドとサステナブル投資:動向、課題、将来展望 (AI 翻訳)

Deepak Shukla

Journal of International Commercial Law and Technologyプレプリント2025-09-24#気候金融Origin: Global
DOI: 10.61336/jiclt/25-01-28
原典: https://doi.org/10.61336/jiclt/25-01-28

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文はグリーンボンド市場の成長、グリーンプレミアムの存在、規制とガバナンスの重要性をレビュー。発行体の種類や認証によってプレミアムが変動することを指摘し、標準化や市場深度の不足などの課題を挙げる。グリーンボンドが持続可能な移行に貢献する可能性を認めつつ、長期的な有効性は規制強化と透明性向上に依存すると結論づける。

English

This paper reviews the growth of the green bond market, the existence of a green premium, and the importance of regulation and governance. It notes that the premium varies by issuer type, certification, and maturity, and identifies challenges such as lack of standardization and market depth. It concludes that green bonds can contribute to the green transition, but long-term effectiveness depends on enhanced regulation and transparency.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本ではグリーンボンド発行が増加しており、本論文の指摘する標準化やグリーンウォッシュ防止の課題は、日本のGX推進政策やSSBJ開示基準の整備にも示唆を与える。

In the global GX context

As green bond issuance grows globally, this paper's discussion of standardization and greenwashing risks is relevant to ongoing efforts by the ISSB and other bodies to harmonize sustainable finance frameworks.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a broad overview of green bond literature and identifies research gaps in premium determinants and market development.

🏢実務担当者:Highlights the importance of certification and transparency for issuers seeking to attract green investors.

🏛政策担当者:Emphasizes the need for regulatory frameworks to prevent greenwashing and support market depth.

📄 Abstract(原文)

The green bonds have come to play a significant role in the wandering sovereign environmental and social finance since besides offering the opportunity to fund environmental and social objectives, they aim to offer vulnerable investors an opportunity to make a responsible investment. Literature on the inclinations, opportunities, and perspectives of green bonds in terms of the debate on the currently existing literature and the measurement of the trend of regulation are the focus of the environment-under-consideration paper. The results indicate that the market of green bonds has increased in the world, and that green bonds in the place of operation and offer as of sovereign, corporate and supranational safety has been gaining pace. The analysis of the financial world has found that green bonds would offer the green premium; investors ought to accept somewhat lower yield with the effect of sustainability. The premium however, is not always constant, but is subjected to the type of issuer, certification, and maturity in the market trade. One of the fixes is governance and regulation since the government can avoid greenwashing itself and support its own image with certification and industrial reviews. It also means that the green bonds have some extent of positive contribution to make in curbing of carbon releasing and financing a viable growth especially with a well-established regulatory system. Along with this development come the problems of the absence of standardization, unequal representation of the world and the absence of markets depth in the developing nations. As the findings indicate, green bonds constitute a strong offer of financial practices to maintain the green transition, though whether they will be effective in the long-term view will be conditioned by the enhanced market regulation, accessibility, and transparency access. The current research would add to the national and policy discussion attempting to offer a way of understanding financial performance, risk distribution, and developmental benefits along with the establishment of future research possibilities in an endeavor to investigate how green bonds will become an increasingly significant part of sustainable investing decision-making.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。