How distributive injustice is produced in nature-based solutions: Institutional pathways across three Brazilian cities
自然的解決策における分配的不正義の発生メカニズム：ブラジル3都市における制度的経路 (AI 翻訳)
Luana Braz Villanova, Bruno Peregrina Puga, Marcus Collier
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
自然を基盤とした解決策（NbS）が気候適応に有効とされる一方、分配的正義が考慮されないと社会的不平等を深化させる。本研究は、ブラジル3都市を事例に、制度的手続きがNbSの配分に不公平をもたらすプロセスを「正義の生産カスケード枠組み」で分析。結果、分配的不正義は実施段階ではなく、手続きと認識のメカニズムの累積効果によって生じることを示す。
English
This paper examines how nature-based solutions (NbS) for climate adaptation can produce distributive injustice through institutional arrangements. Using a Justice Production Cascade Framework, it analyzes three Brazilian cities and finds that unjust outcomes stem not from implementation failures but from procedural decisions and recognition mechanisms that stabilize unequal spatial patterns. It argues for shifting focus to early institutional production of justice.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
ブラジルの事例だが、日本の都市計画や気候適応政策においても、NbS導入時の公正性確保は重要課題。日本のSSBJや統合報告書では環境正義はまだ前面に出ていないが、今後の政策連動で示唆を得られる。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to the global discourse on environmental justice in climate adaptation, particularly for Global South cities. Although not directly about decarbonization, it offers a framework applicable to any climate policy where distributive outcomes matter, relevant for TCFD/ISSB's social aspects.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:The Justice Production Cascade Framework offers a novel approach for studying environmental justice in adaptation policies.
🏢実務担当者:Urban planners can use the framework to assess how early procedural decisions affect equitable outcomes of NbS projects.
🏛政策担当者:The paper highlights the need to integrate justice criteria early in policy cycles for climate adaptation.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Nature-based Solutions (NbS) have been promoted as promising instruments for climate adaptation and the strengthening of urban resilience, particularly in the Global South. However, evidence indicates that their implementation may reproduce or deepen socio-spatial inequalities when justice criteria are not consistently incorporated into decision-making processes. We investigate how distributive injustices associated with NbS are produced prior to implementation, through institutional arrangements that structure decision-making in urban policies. We propose the Justice Production Cascade Framework, which conceives the procedural, recognition, and distributive dimensions of environmental justice as interdependent stages of a single causal chain. The framework makes it possible to trace how decision-making arenas, institutional knowledge filters, and categories of recognition shape, from the early stages of the public policy cycle, the territorial patterns of NbS allocation. We apply the framework to three Brazilian cities: São Paulo, Campinas, and São José dos Campos. The results show that distributive injustice does not primarily stem from implementation failures, but from the cumulative effect of procedural decisions and recognition mechanisms that stabilize unequal spatial trajectories. By shifting the analytical focus from the late-stage assessment of distributive effects to an understanding of their institutional production, we seek to advance the debate on environmental justice in NbS. We argue that the Global South offers a privileged lens to render these mechanisms visible, with relevant implications for the science-policy interface and for the design of more just policies.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbsj.2026.100351first seen 2026-06-17 05:29:14 · last seen 2026-06-17 07:13:44
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。