Green FDI Decline, Domestic Investor Shift, and Indonesia's Energy Transition Legal Study
グリーンFDIの減少、国内投資家シフト、そしてインドネシアのエネルギー転換：法研究 (AI 翻訳)
William Sepvano The
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
インドネシアのエネルギー転換において、環境許認可の硬直性や独占的な調達契約、地産地消要件によりグリーンFDIが減少し、国内投資が急増する構造的異常を分析。緩和策が逆に法的不確実性を生むと指摘し、許認可迅速化や独立調達機関の設立、ブレンデッドファイナンスの活用を提言。
English
This study analyzes the structural anomaly in Indonesia's energy transition where green FDI declines sharply while domestic investment surges, attributing it to rigid environmental permitting, monopolistic procurement contracts, and local content requirements. It recommends permitting acceleration, an independent procurement agency, and leveraging sovereign wealth funds in blended finance to resolve normative clashes.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本企業がインドネシアのエネルギー転換事業に参入する際、本論文が指す許認可負担や調達リスクは直接的な投資判断材料となる。特にJETP（公正エネルギー移行パートナーシップ）下での日本支援策との整合性を検討する上で示唆に富む。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to global understanding of how regulatory rigidity and domestic protectionism can hinder green FDI in energy transitions, relevant for countries designing investment frameworks under initiatives like Just Energy Transition Partnerships (JETP). It offers a legal perspective on balancing domestic industry promotion with attracting international climate finance.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Insights on legal barriers to energy transition investment, useful for comparative policy studies.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights regulatory risks (permitting, procurement, local content) for foreign investors in Indonesia's energy sector.
🏛政策担当者:Recommendations on legal architecture reform to harmonize green investment and domestic industry goals.
📄 Abstract（原文）
This article investigates the structural anomaly in Indonesia's energy transition when green Foreign Direct Investment sharply declines while domestic investment surges very massively. Utilizing doctrinal legal research through regulatory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, this study examines the related investment landscape. Findings prove that the investment contraction stems from expensive transaction costs due to environmental permitting rigidity, exploitative monopoly procurement contracts, and restrictive local component requirements. Conversely, domestic capital dominates through relational flexibility within captive electricity utility downstreaming. The recent component relaxation policies actually introduce secondary legal uncertainties and discriminatory practices against domestic banking syndications. To resolve this normative clash, this research recommends reconstructing the legal architecture by implementing permitting acceleration, establishing an independent electricity procurement agency to ensure risk allocation equilibrium, harmonizing inclusive policies, and leveraging the sovereign wealth fund institution within blended finance schemes to secure commercial bankability, absolute legal certainty, and comprehensive spatial ecological justice for all global actors.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.65101/jspp.v1i3.363first seen 2026-06-20 05:08:32
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。