← 論文一覧に戻る

Transparency in present and emerging processes for LIB-recycling – Requirements and availability

LIBリサイクルにおける現在および新興プロセスの透明性 – 要件とデータ利用可能性 (AI 翻訳)

Andreas Muth, Sebastian Schlund

Energy Reports📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-05-29#サプライチェーンOrigin: EU経営インパクト: 調達リスク対象セクター: automotive
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2026.109389
原典: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2026.109389

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本研究は、リチウムイオン電池(LIB)リサイクルにおけるデジタル製品パスポート(DPP)の役割を検討し、専門家インタビューとプロセスマッピングを通じてリサイクルに必要な61のデータ属性を特定した。現在のDPPに含まれる属性は35項目であるが、解体自動化や直接リサイクルを支える追加属性が不可欠と指摘する。透明性向上は経済的・環境的・安全面での便益をもたらし、EU電池リサイクル産業の持続可能性と競争力強化に寄与する可能性がある。

English

This study examines the role of the Digital Product Passport (DPP) in LIB recycling, identifying 61 critical data attributes through expert interviews and process mapping. While 35 attributes are already covered, additional data for disassembly automation and direct recycling are essential. Enhanced transparency yields economic, environmental, and safety benefits, supporting EU battery recycling competitiveness.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

欧州電池規則に基づくDPP義務化は、日本からEUへ輸出する自動車・電池メーカーにも影響する。本研究成果は、サプライチェーン上流でのデータ整備が鍵となることを示しており、日本企業の実務対応と設計戦略に示唆を与える。

In the global GX context

This paper provides empirical evidence on the data requirements for a functioning Digital Product Passport under the EU Battery Regulation, a landmark transparency instrument for circular economy. It offers a framework for aligning DPP design with recycling technology needs, informing global policy and corporate readiness for battery supply chain due diligence.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a structured set of data attributes and gap analysis that can guide further research on DPP and battery recycling pathways.

🏢実務担当者:Highlights which product data need to be collected and shared to ensure future recyclability, useful for compliance planning and circular design.

🏛政策担当者:Confirms that DPP must evolve iteratively with material and process data additions to effectively enable recycling innovation.

📄 Abstract(原文)

The exponential growth of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) from electric vehicles is driving both resource demand and end-of-life battery waste, underscoring the urgent need for efficient recycling solutions. This paper investigates the role of the Digital Product Passport (DPP) in enhancing transparency and information flow across the LIB recycling value chain, with a focus on both present technologies and processes (PTPs) and emerging technologies and processes (ETPs). Through expert interviews and process mapping with industry stakeholders and research institutions, the study identifies 61 critical data attributes required for effective recycling and analyzes their current availability for PTPs and relevance for PTPs and ETPs. The findings reveal that while 35 out of 55 essential product data attributes are already included in the current DPP framework, additional attributes – particularly those supporting disassembly automation and direct recycling – are imperative to ensure long-term technological viability. The research highlights the need for iterative updates to the DPP and for retaining and transferring material- and process-specific data beyond product identification in the form of three material and three process data attributes. Impact analysis demonstrates that increased transparency has the potential to yield economic, environmental, and safety benefits, including cost reductions, emission savings, and risk mitigation. The study concludes that the DPP, if iteratively refined and supplemented with material and process data, can serve as a powerful enabler for both established and innovative recycling technologies. These insights provide a foundation for ongoing policy development and industry adoption, ensuring the sustainability and competitiveness of the European battery recycling sector.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。