Canada and the Q-NPT Framework for a Nuclear Energy Future: Embedding Trust, Equity, and Governance in Energy Transitions

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

🔬研究者:The governance metrics and quantitative thresholds provide a basis for empirical evaluation of nuclear social legitimacy and transition readiness.

🏢実務担当者:The actionable institutional reforms (trust panels, stakeholder protocols, workforce pipelines) offer concrete steps for nuclear project developers and utilities.

🏛政策担当者:The Q-NPT roadmap and governance indicators can guide regulatory frameworks to build public trust and accelerate nuclear deployment.

Achieving net-zero energy systems requires combining technological deployment with governance innovations that secure public legitimacy, equity and international credibility. Nuclear energy – including large reactors and emerging small modular reactors (SMRs) – offers firm, low-carbon power that can complement variable renewables, but expansion is constrained by public distrust, governance fragmentation, workforce challenges and concerns about cost and waste. This article advances the Qudrat-Ullah Nuclear Peace and Trust (Q-NPT) framework as a systemic governance approach that explicitly embeds trust, equity and institutional learning into nuclear energy deployment strategies, aligning nuclear investments with energy transition objectives. Using Canada as a detailed case, we map Q-NPT elements onto Canadian governance structures, energy infrastructure and nascent SMR programs. Empirical material (national generation shares, regulatory milestones, SMR licensing progress and workforce trends) shows both the opportunity and the governance barriers Canada faces. This study introduces measurable governance metrics – covering trust, equity, transparency, participation and institutional capacity – to evaluate nuclear social legitimacy and transition readiness. Quantitative thresholds include targeted increases of ≥ 20 percentage points in public trust; ≥ 25% Indigenous participation in decision processes; ≥ 80 – 90% transparency in project documentation and a workforce pipeline of 75,000 – 90,000 skilled workers by 2040. These thresholds provide a predictive, results-oriented basis for evaluating governance progress, addressing a key gap in existing nuclear policy frameworks. We propose actionable institutional reforms (independent trust panels, stakeholder engagement protocols, workforce pipelines and international integration strategies) and an operational roadmap for Q-NPT implementation. Results indicate that applying Q-NPT measurably improves governance performance compared to conventional models by elevating trust, reducing procedural conflict, strengthening equity outcomes and accelerating regulatory acceptance. Without such deliberate trust-building and equity mechanisms, nuclear energy ’ s technical potential will remain underutilized; conversely, Q-NPT provides a structured pathway for achieving just, credible and scalable decarbonization.

• semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.1017/etr.2026.10012first seen 2026-05-15 17:55:09