Comparative analysis of green finance policies in the EU, China and ASEAN: Policy implications for Vietnam
EU、中国、ASEANのグリーンファイナンス政策の比較分析：ベトナムへの政策的示唆 (AI 翻訳)
null Nghiem Xuan Khoat
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、EU、中国、ASEANのグリーンファイナンス政策を比較分析し、ベトナムへの政策的示唆を導出する。EUは包括的な法的枠組みとESG開示要件、中国は国家主導のモデル、ASEANは調和と協力の初期段階にある。ベトナムには、強固な法的枠組み、国内優先事項に沿ったタクソノミー、民間セクター参加の促進を提言する。
English
This paper compares green finance policies in the EU, China, and ASEAN to derive policy implications for Vietnam. The EU features comprehensive legal frameworks and ESG disclosure; China adopts a state-led model; ASEAN is in early harmonization stages. Recommendations for Vietnam include a robust legal framework, a national taxonomy, and private sector incentives.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本にとって、EUのタクソノミーや中国の国家主導モデルとの比較は、日本のグリーンファイナンス政策（GX推進戦略など）の位置づけを考える上で参考になる。特に、ASEANとの連携やベトナムへの示唆は、日本のアジア地域でのGX協力に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to global GX discourse by comparing three major green finance regimes, highlighting the EU's regulatory leadership, China's state-driven approach, and ASEAN's regional coordination. It offers lessons for developing countries designing green finance ecosystems, relevant to ISSB and transition finance discussions.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a structured comparison of green finance policies across three regions, useful for policy diffusion and institutional design studies.
🏢実務担当者:Offers insights into regulatory trends and market mechanisms that could inform corporate green finance strategies in emerging markets.
🏛政策担当者:Delivers concrete policy recommendations for Vietnam and similar economies, emphasizing legal frameworks, taxonomy, and private sector engagement.
📄 Abstract（原文）
This paper conducts a comparative analysis of green finance policies in the European Union (EU), China, and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), aiming to draw relevant policy implications for Vietnam in the context of green transition. By examining legal frameworks, incentive mechanisms, financial instruments, and private sector involvement, the study reveals that each region follows a distinct approach. The EU stands out for its comprehensive legal architecture, including the EU Taxonomy for sustainable activities and stringent environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure requirements. China adopts a state-led green finance model, with a strong policy push and oversight by the People’s Bank of China, combining regulatory incentives and financial guidance. ASEAN, meanwhile, is in a formative stage of policy development, focusing on harmonizing green standards, promoting regional green bond markets, and enhancing cross-border cooperation. Based on these insights, the paper proposes strategic recommendations for Vietnam, including the development of a robust legal framework for green finance, the establishment of a national taxonomy aligned with domestic priorities, and the strengthening of financial institutions and regulatory capacities. In addition, the paper emphasizes the need to incentivize private sector participation and create an efficient green capital market. The findings contribute significantly to Vietnam’s efforts in building a resilient green finance ecosystem that supports long-term sustainable growth. This study offers valuable guidance for policymakers, regulators, and financial actors engaged in the green transition.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openaire https://doi.org/10.55250/jo.vnuf.10.2.2025.109-116first seen 2026-05-05 19:06:59
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。