Structural transformation: Testing convergence in energy, carbon emissions, innovation, and governance
構造変革：エネルギー、炭素排出、イノベーション、ガバナンスにおける収束の検証 (AI 翻訳)
O. Lyulyov, Tetyana Pimonenko, Li Ruoxi
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
EU27カ国とウクライナを対象に、グリーン転換の収束動態をσ・β収束分析で検証。再生可能エネルギーと研究開発は収束する一方、炭素排出は国間格差が大きく、ガバナンスは発散傾向を示す。金融危機やパンデミックなどのショックが収束経路に影響。テクノロジー・イノベーション次元が排出・ガバナンスより速く収束する非対称性を明らかにし、政策の差別化とガバナンス強化の必要性を示唆。
English
This study examines convergence dynamics in the European green transition using a balanced panel of 27 EU member states and Ukraine from 2004 to 2023. Applying σ- and β-convergence analyses, it finds asymmetric patterns: renewable energy and R&D intensity converge significantly, while carbon emissions remain heterogeneous and institutional governance diverges or only conditionally converges. Major shocks like the financial crisis and COVID-19 shape trajectories. The results highlight that technological and innovation dimensions converge faster than emissions and governance, calling for differentiated policies and stronger governance for a balanced transition.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
本論文はEUのグリーン転換における収束非対称性を実証しており、日本でもカーボンニュートラル目標の達成に向けて、地域・部門ごとに異なる進捗を考慮した政策設計の必要性を示唆する。特に、技術面の進展と排出削減・制度ガバナンスの間にタイムラグが生じる可能性があり、SSBJや有報の枠組みにおけるレジリエンス評価にも示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
This paper empirically demonstrates asymmetric convergence in the green transition across EU countries, offering insights for global policymakers. It reveals that technological and innovation dimensions converge more rapidly than emissions and governance, implying that integrated policy frameworks must account for differing speeds of change. The findings are relevant for ISSB, CSRD, and national climate strategies, emphasizing that governance quality and institutional alignment are critical for a balanced transition.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides empirical evidence of convergence dynamics across multiple dimensions of the green transition, useful for scholars studying transition pathways and policy effectiveness.
🏢実務担当者:May inform corporate strategy by highlighting that technology adoption and innovation can outpace emissions reductions, suggesting the need for long-term planning.
🏛政策担当者:Reveals that governance quality may diverge even as renewable energy converges, underscoring the need for differentiated policy instruments and institutional strengthening.
📄 Abstract（原文）
The green transition has increasingly been conceptualised as a process of structural transformation encompassing energy systems, innovation capacity, carbon performance, and institutional governance. However, whether this transformation leads to convergence across countries or reinforces persistent structural divergence remains an open empirical question. This study examines convergence dynamics within the European green transition by analysing a balanced panel of 27 European Union member states and Ukraine over the period 2004–2023. The analysis applies complementary σ-convergence indicators and β-convergence regressions, including pooled, fixed-effects, and time-effects specifications, to distinguish between cross-country structural disparities and within-country adjustment dynamics. The results reveal asymmetric convergence patterns across transition dimensions. Renewable energy penetration and research and development intensity exhibit statistically significant convergence, reflecting coordinated policy frameworks and technological diffusion. In contrast, carbon emissions remain highly heterogeneous at the cross-country level, while institutional governance quality displays divergence in pooled specifications and only conditional convergence once country-specific effects are controlled for. Time-effects estimations further indicate that major systemic shocks, such as the global financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic, have significantly shaped convergence trajectories. The findings demonstrate that the green transition in EU unfolds as an institutionally mediated structural transformation, in which technological and innovation dimensions converge more rapidly than emissions and governance. This underscores the need for differentiated policy instruments and strengthened governance architectures to support balanced and resilient green transition pathways.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2026/19-1/8first seen 2026-05-25 04:33:16 · last seen 2026-05-27 04:31:49
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。