A review of renewable energy scenarios in Europe: methodological approaches and societal elements amid geopolitical tensions
ヨーロッパにおける再生可能エネルギーシナリオのレビュー：方法論的アプローチと地政学的緊張の中での社会的要素 (AI 翻訳)
Olli-Matti Mikkola, Nelli Eerikäinen, Sakari Höysniemi, Saara Luukkonen, Panu Runko, Lauri Sääskilahti, Tuomas Niinistö, Pasi Rikkonen
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
このシステマティックレビューは、欧州の再生可能エネルギーシナリオに関する研究をPESTEフレームワークで分析。技術経済的要素に偏った実証主義パラダイムが支配的で、社会的・生物物理的要素を軽視していることを指摘。地政学的緊張を考慮するには学際的視点が不可欠と結論。
English
This systematic review of European renewable energy scenarios uses the PESTE framework to reveal a dominant positivist paradigm focused on techno-economic drivers, sidelining societal and biophysical aspects. It argues for interdisciplinary approaches to better capture geopolitical disruptions.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
欧州のシナリオ手法の批判的検討は、日本におけるGX政策やエネルギー計画にも示唆を与える。特に地政学リスクを織り込んだシナリオ構築の必要性は、日本のエネルギー安全保障上も重要。
In the global GX context
This paper critiques techno-economic bias in European energy scenarios, highlighting the need to integrate geopolitical factors—a lesson for global GX modeling practices.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Useful for those studying energy scenario methodologies and the role of social factors in transition models.
🏛政策担当者:Relevant for energy policymakers seeking to incorporate geopolitical and social dimensions into scenario planning.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Abstract This systematic review focuses on the role of renewable energy in shaping the future of the European energy system. It explores the scientific renewable energy scenarios and offers insights into how broadly European-level scenarios have scanned future energy landscapes and the types of utilised scientific knowledge amid geopolitical tensions. To explore the dimensions of the scenario studies, the analysis applies the PESTE framework, which reflects the results on multidisciplinary three perspectives framework for the energy transition. The results underscore a prevailing positivist paradigm in scenario studies of energy transition, conceptualising it as a future characterised by inevitable advancements in techno-economic drivers while other societal as well as biophysical elements tend to play a minor role. However, it is evident that this approach has not been, and will not be in the future, capable of anticipating implications of geopolitical disruptions of the kind witnessed in recent years, for instance. Consequently, there should be more scenario studies based on disciplinary insights beyond techno-economic drivers to increase the understanding of the future of renewable energy. Indeed, there is still an engagement gap in how to effectively deepen dialogue between different disciplines in scenario studies to best describe the energy transition.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1186/s40309-026-00268-wfirst seen 2026-05-18 04:38:02 · last seen 2026-05-29 05:19:58
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。