農村地域における空間的正義とエネルギー転換：ブラジル伝統的領域における集団的土地転換の政治
Spatial Justice and energy transitions in rural areas: The politics of collective land transformation in Brazilian traditional territories (原題)
J. Cavalli de Meira
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
ブラジル・バイア州の伝統的コミュニティ17地域を対象に、風力・太陽光発電事業がもたらす正義と空間的収奪を質的に分析。従来のエネルギー正義論では捉えられない「領域的完全性」「排除」「知識の軽視」「時空間操作」「代替的未来」の5次元を提示する。再エネ事業が集団的土地管理を解体し空間を再編する実態を示し、公正な移行の前提を問い直す。
English
A qualitative study of 17 traditional communities in Bahia, Brazil, examines how wind and solar projects produce spatial injustice. It identifies five dimensions—territorial wholeness, exclusion, knowledge dismissal, temporal-spatial manipulation, and alternative futures—showing renewables reconfigure space for extraction and dismantle collective land governance, challenging 'just transition' assumptions in the Global South.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本のGX文脈では、再エネ拡大に伴う地域社会・土地利用との摩擦（メガソーラー、風力の地元合意）を考える際の参照枠となる。SSBJ・有報の開示論とは直接接続しないが、地域ステークホルダー対応や社会的受容（SLO）を検討する企業・自治体に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Globally, this speaks to the social dimension of transition finance and the 'S' in ESG, questioning whether renewable deployment alone satisfies just-transition claims. It adds Global South empirical evidence to disclosure debates increasingly attentive to community consent, land rights, and social license—relevant to CSRD/ISSB social and stakeholder considerations.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:エネルギー正義・空間的正義の理論をGlobal Southの再エネ事例に適用した質的研究として、公正な移行論の再検討に有用。
🏢実務担当者:再エネ事業の開発・調達に関わる企業が、地域合意・土地権利・社会的受容（SLO）リスクを評価する視点を提供する。
🏛政策担当者:再エネ導入政策において、土地集団管理や地域コミュニティの権利保護を組み込む必要性を示唆する。
📄 Abstract（原文）
This research investigates how traditional communities in Bahia, Brazil, perceive and experience justice in renewable energy transitions. Through qualitative analysis of seventeen communities affected by wind and solar energy projects, the study reveals that conventional energy justice frameworks fail to capture the spatial dimensions of dispossession occurring in these territories. Unlike industrialised regions transitioning from fossil fuels, these communities face their first encounter with industrial energy infrastructure in collectively managed territories sustained for centuries. Drawing on Soja's spatial justice theory, the analysis identifies five dimensions of spatial justice and injustice, namely territorial wholeness, exclusion, knowledge dismissal, temporal-spatial manipulation, and alternative futures. Communities articulate justice as territorial wholeness, defined through the integrity of their land and their collective governance, revealing how renewable energy projects actively reconfigure space to enable extraction while destroying collective management systems. The findings challenge assumptions about just transitions and demonstrate that achieving sustainability requires respecting the spatial relations sustaining traditional territories. • Traditional communities in Bahia define justice as territorial wholeness exposing spatial disposession • Renewable projects are these territories' first industrial infrastructure, unsettling the transition narrative • Renewable energy projects reconfigure space for extraction, and dismantle collective land management systems • Sustainability requires respecting traditional territories' spatial relations, beyond replacing fossil fuels • Communities define justice via spatial integrity challenging 'just transitions' framings in the Global South
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2026.102132first seen 2026-09-18 04:38:22
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。