← 論文一覧に戻る

The Carbon Budget: Applied Normative Perspectives

炭素予算:応用規範的視点 (AI 翻訳)

Diana Piroli, Alberto Pirni

Journal of Applied Philosophy📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-07-28#政策Origin: EU
DOI: 10.1002/japp.70117
原典: https://doi.org/10.1002/japp.70117

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本稿は、炭素予算の公正な配分に関する第一世代の研究を踏まえ、政策設計、公共的推論、制度実施、法的説明責任に焦点を当てた第二世代の研究を提案する。応用哲学の観点から、規範的なコミットメントがどのように正当化され、政策に翻訳され、争われ、執行されるかを考察する。

English

This paper proposes a second generation of carbon budget studies focusing on policy design, public reasoning, institutional implementation, and legal accountability, complementing earlier distributive concerns. It argues that the future of carbon budget research lies in understanding how normative commitments can be justified, translated into policy, contested, and enforced under urgency and political disagreement.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本の2050年カーボンニュートラル目標の下で、炭素予算の配分と実装は重要な課題である。本稿は、炭素予算の規範的原則を政策や制度に落とし込むための応用哲学的枠組みを提供し、日本の政策立案や訴訟実務に示唆を与える。

In the global GX context

In the global context of the Paris Agreement and net-zero targets, this paper shifts carbon budget discourse from distributive justice to practical implementation. It is relevant for policymakers and legal scholars working on translating carbon budgets into enforceable policies and litigation strategies.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:This paper provides a framework for applied philosophical research on carbon budgets, bridging normative theory and policy implementation.

🏢実務担当者:Corporate sustainability teams may find limited direct applicability, as the focus is on normative policy design rather than operational guidance.

🏛政策担当者:Policymakers involved in designing national carbon budgets and climate laws can benefit from the paper's emphasis on public reasoning, institutional implementation, and legal accountability.

📄 Abstract(原文)

ABSTRACT The carbon budget has become a central concept in contemporary climate justice research, generating extensive debate over its fair distribution. While a first generation of scholarship has focused primarily on identifying principles for allocating the remaining carbon budget, less attention has been devoted to the practical questions that arise once such principles are expected to guide collective action. Our contribution proposes a second generation of carbon budget studies that complements distributive concerns with a distinctly applied‐philosophical focus on policy design, public reasoning, institutional implementation, and legal accountability. This article outlines the framework that the subsequent three contributions examine through the lenses of policy feasibility, philosophical expertise in public decision‐making, and climate litigation. Shaping the symposium presented here, they argue that the future of carbon budget research lies not only in determining what justice requires in distributive terms, but also in understanding how normative commitments can be justified, translated into policy, contested, and enforced under conditions of increasing urgency, political disagreement, and institutional constraint.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。