PSX非金融企業における気候リスク開示、グリーンファイナンス、資本コスト
Climate Risk Disclosure, Green Finance, and Cost of Capital Among PSX Non-Financial Firms (原題)
Muhammad Ashraf, Dr. Amanullah Khattak, Dr. Khalid Rehman, Dr Muhammad Waseem Quershi
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
パキスタン証券取引所(PSX)の非金融企業165社・2013〜2023年のパネルデータを用い、TCFD整合の気候リスク開示指数(CRDI)が資本コスト(株主資本・負債・WACC)を有意に低下させることをSystem GMMで示した。グリーンファイナンスが部分的媒介(約38.5%)し、取締役会の環境専門性が媒介経路を強化する調整効果も確認。移行リスク開示は物理的リスク開示より資本コスト低減効果が大きい。
English
Using a 2013-2023 panel of 165 PSX-listed non-financial firms, this study shows a TCFD-aligned climate risk disclosure index (CRDI) significantly lowers cost of equity, debt, and WACC. Green finance partially mediates the CRDI-cost of equity link (~38.5%), and board environmental expertise moderates the mediated pathway. Transition risk disclosure reduces capital costs more than physical risk disclosure.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
新興国PSXでのTCFD整合開示と資本コストの実証は、SSBJ基準導入・有報での気候開示義務化を進める日本企業にとって、開示の経済的便益(資本コスト低減)を裏付ける比較材料となる。特に取締役会の環境専門性が効果を増幅する点は、日本企業のガバナンス設計・取締役会スキルマトリクス見直しに示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
This adds emerging-market evidence to the global TCFD/ISSB literature that climate disclosure lowers cost of capital, extending the mediation role of green finance and board environmental expertise. It complements CSRD/SEC climate-rule debates by quantifying disclosure benefits in a developing-economy disclosure regime (SECP/SBP).
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:気候開示と資本コストの因果経路にグリーンファイナンス媒介と取締役会専門性調整を組み込んだ新興国パネル実証の参照枠を提供する。
🏢実務担当者:TCFD整合の気候リスク開示と取締役会の環境専門性強化が、資本コスト低減・グリーンファイナンス調達に直結しうることを示す。
🏛政策担当者:SECPによるTCFD開示義務化やSBPサステナブルファイナンス枠組みが、企業の資本コスト最適化インセンティブとして機能する根拠を提供する。
📄 Abstract(原文)
ABSTRACT: Purpose: The purpose of this study is to examine correlations between climate risk disclosure quality (CRDI), green finance (GFI), and cost of capital (COC) among Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX)-based non-financial companies for 2013-2023. The study is based on Information Asymmetry Theory, Stakeholder Theory and Legitimacy Theory to investigate whether superior climate risk disclosure leads to lower cost of equity, debt and WACC; whether green finance acts as a mediator in the context of the aforementioned relationship; and whether board environmental expertise acts as a moderator in the mediated pathway. Design/Methodology/Approach: An unbalanced panel of 165 PSX-listed non-financial firms (maximum 1,815 firm-year observations) is analyzed. The Climate Risk Disclosure Index (CRDI) is a 24-item index based on structured content analysis (dual-coder, Cohen's Kappa = 0.83), which can be disaggregated to include the categories of transition risk disclosure (TRD), physical risk disclosure (PRD), and governance climate accountability (GCA). Cost of equity is calculated by using CAPM, cost of debt by using the interest expense ratio and WACC by using the market-value weighting. Green finance is expressed in a PCA-weighted combination of four instruments. Endogeneity is controlled for using System GMM (Blundell and Bond, 1998). Estimation of mediation (PROCESS Model 4) and moderated mediation (PROCESS Model 14) involves the use of BCa bootstrapped confidence intervals (5000 iterations). Findings: CRDI is negatively and significantly associated with cost of equity (beta = -0.187, p < 0.001), cost of debt (beta = -0.142, p < 0.001), and WACC (beta = -0.168, p < 0.001). The CRDI-cost of equity relationship is partially mediated by green finance (indirect effect = -0.072; BCa 95% CI [-0.118, -0.031]), accounting for nearly 38.5% of the total. Highly-efficient boards (IMM = -0.024; BCa 95% CI [-0.041, -0.009]) provide significant moderation of this mediated pathway, reducing costs by 2.1x more. Other disclosure variables, including transition risk disclosure (beta = -0.214), have higher effects on capital costs than do physical risk disclosure (beta = -0.156). All results are robust to GMM endogeneity correction. Research Limitations: Single-country PSX setting; GRI content-analysis-based CRDI is based on self-disclosed reports; limited data availability on green finance after 2023 for SECP-mandatory PE disclosures; and availability of data for the era before SECP-mandatory PE disclosures is limited. Practical Implications: Ensure that SECP require TCFD related disclosures by PSX companies. To incentivize green finance cost reduction, environmental expertise investment is needed in boards. SBP Sustainable Finance Framework certification is a capital cost optimizing strategy outside of regulation. Originality/Value: It is the first study which provide the TCFD-aligned CRDI for PSX non-financial firms disaggregating TRD, PRD, and GCA; (2) it is the first study to find evidence of CRDI-COC through the mediation of green finance; (3) it is the first study to test Board EE as a moderator; and (4) it is the most comprehensive PSX decade panel climate disclosure and capital costs with System GMM correction. Keywords: climate risk disclosure; green finance; cost of capital; TCFD; board environmental expertise; PSX; WACC; information asymmetry; System GMM; emerging markets
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- Zenodo https://zenodo.org/records/23154732first seen 2026-10-06 04:17:20 · last seen 2026-10-07 04:12:56
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。