産業デジタル化とグローバルバリューチェーンにおける便益分配の公平性：貿易利益と内包炭素排出コストの視点から
Industrial Digitalization and the Fairness of Benefit Distribution in Global Value Chains: A Perspective Based on Trade Gains and Embodied Carbon Emission Costs (原題)
Zhen Jia, Ran Yang, Hao Xiao
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
産業デジタル化がGVCにおける貿易利益と内包炭素排出負担の分配の不平等を緩和することを、二国間貿易・環境不平等指数を用いて実証した研究。中間財貿易を通じた技術スピルオーバーとGVC分業地位格差の縮小が主要なメカニズムである。経済開放・技術革新・ルール基盤の三領域での国際協調が効果を強めることを示す。
English
This paper builds a bilateral trade and environmental inequality index to test how industrial digitalization affects the distribution of trade gains and embodied carbon burdens across GVC partners. It finds digitalization reduces trade and environmental inequality, mainly via technology spillovers through intermediate goods trade and a narrower GVC division-of-labor status gap. Cross-country synergy in openness, innovation, and rule-based governance amplifies the effect.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
内包炭素（embodied carbon）の国際配分を扱う点は、Scope 3やCBAM対応、サプライチェーン排出配分を議論する日本企業・政策当局にとって示唆がある。ただし開示制度やSSBJとの直接接続はなく、参照は限定的。
In the global GX context
Adds industry-level evidence on how digitalization shifts embodied-carbon and trade-gain distribution across GVC partners — relevant to CBAM, Scope 3 allocation debates, and the equity dimension of global climate policy, though it does not engage TCFD/ISSB disclosure frameworks directly.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a bilateral inequality index framework linking digitalization, GVC position, and embodied carbon burden distribution.
🏢実務担当者:Suggests digitalization in supply chains may reduce exposure to embodied-carbon cost shifting, but offers no operational disclosure guidance.
🏛政策担当者:Supports cross-border coordination on openness, innovation, and rule-based governance to make GVC decarbonization more equitable.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Abstract Digital transformation has driven the restructuring of the global value chain (GVC) division of labor and reshaped the landscape of benefit distribution. Adopting the perspective of GVC benefit-cost tradeoffs, this paper constructs a bilateral trade and environmental inequality index and systematically examines the impact of industrial digitalization on the inequality of benefit distribution in trade relations along with its underlying mechanisms. The findings show that industrial digitalization alleviates trade and environmental inequality, promoting a more balanced distribution of trade gains and trade-embodied carbon emission burdens across countries. Mechanism tests reveal that enhancing technology spillovers through intermediate goods trade and narrowing the GVC division-of-labor status gap are important channels through which industrial digitalization reduces trade and environmental inequality. Further analysis shows that joint synergy among countries across three dimensions—economic openness, technological innovation, and rule-based governance—strengthens the ameliorative effect of industrial digitalization on trade and environmental inequality. This paper provides industry-level evidence on the trade and environmental benefit distribution effects of industrial digitalization and offers potential references for accelerating the process of industrial digitalization, strengthening joint synergy among countries, and ultimately advancing a new paradigm of economic globalization that balances efficiency, fairness, and green development.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1515/cfer-2026-0018first seen 2026-09-19 05:03:57
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。