Biomass carbon removal can help sustainable aviation fuels achieve on-time arrival

バイオマス炭素除去が持続可能な航空燃料のタイムリーな実現を支援する (AI 翻訳)

Matthew Langholtz, Charlotte Levy, John Field, Daniel L. Sanchez, Pete Christensen, Lawrence Murdoch, Daniel de la Torre Ugarte, O.A. Oyedeji, Ryan Jacobson, Ning Zeng, Emily A. Heaton, Charles Forsberg, William Joe Sagues

iScience📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-05-23#エネルギー転換Origin: US経営インパクト: コスト削減対象セクター: aviation

DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115956

原典: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2026.115956

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

バイオマス炭素除去（BiCRS）と持続可能航空燃料（SAF）は競合する経路と見なされがちだが、本論文では両者が補完的であることを示す。BiCRSは供給チェーンを早期に構築し、SAFの投資リスクを低減する。これにより、短期の炭素除去と長期の燃料目標の両立が可能となる。

English

This paper argues that biomass carbon removal (BiCRS) and sustainable aviation fuels (SAF) are complementary, not competing. BiCRS can establish reliable biomass supply chains early, reducing investment risk for future SAF biorefineries. This approach enables both near-term carbon removal and long-term sustainable fuel goals under uncertain market conditions.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本はSAF導入目標を掲げており、本論文のBiCRSとSAFの相補性の指摘は、国内のバイオマス利活用政策やカーボンクレジット市場設計に示唆を与える。供給チェーン構築の優先順位付けに役立つ。

In the global GX context

Globally, many governments are promoting both carbon removal and sustainable aviation fuels. This paper provides a framework for integrating these pathways, showing that early BiCRS deployment can accelerate SAF scale-up. It offers evidence for policy coherence in climate and energy strategies.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Highlights the economic and temporal complementarity between BiCRS and SAF, offering a nuanced view beyond the 'best-use' debate.

🏢実務担当者:Suggests that investing in BiCRS early can reduce supply chain risks and enable later SAF projects.

🏛政策担当者:Argues for integrated policies that support both carbon removal and biofuel deployment, rather than treating them as alternatives.

📄 Abstract（原文）

Biofuels, including sustainable aviation and marine fuels, and biomass carbon removal and storage (BiCRS) are often viewed as potentially competing pathways for advancing climate and energy goals. Their comparative economic, environmental, and temporal advantages remain debated. Rather than identifying a "best-use" for biomass, we show that the relative economic advantages of BiCRS versus biofuels exist along a continuum shaped by energy- and decarbonization-focused market conditions. These pathways need not be adversarial: BiCRS can enable, rather than displace, future biofuel deployment. While the lignocellulosic biofuel sector continues to face barriers associated with underdeveloped supply chains and technologies that have not yet been commercialized at scale, emerging BiCRS approaches are comparatively feedstock-flexible, rapidly deployable, and responsive to carbon removal markets. Early BiCRS deployment can help establish reliable biomass supply chains, reducing investment risk for future lignocellulosic biorefineries. By easing initial supply chain constraints, BiCRS can serve as a practical stepping stone toward meeting both near-term carbon removal needs and long-term sustainable fuel objectives under uncertain future market and policy conditions.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2026.115956first seen 2026-06-11 04:59:26

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方はキーワードアラートに登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。