Legal Certainty of Carbon Credits as FDI Objects: Indonesian Investment Normative Vacuum
カーボンクレジットの外国直接投資対象としての法的確実性:インドネシア投資法の規範的空白 (AI 翻訳)
Jessica Esther Warouw
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、インドネシアにおけるカーボンクレジットの外国直接投資対象としての法的位置づけの欠如を分析。投資法の規範的空白が外国投資家に法的不確実性をもたらし、間接収用や資本送還のリスクを生じさせることを指摘。結論として、炭素単位の投資対象としての法定再分類の緊急性を主張している。
English
This paper analyzes the normative vacuum in Indonesian investment law regarding carbon credits as foreign direct investment objects. It finds that the lack of property rights recognition over carbon assets creates legal uncertainty, risks of indirect expropriation, and ambiguity in capital repatriation. The authors argue for urgent statutory requalification of carbon units as investment objects.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本企業のインドネシアにおけるカーボンクレジット投資に関して、法的確実性の欠如が投資リスクとなる点を示しており、日本のGX政策(J-クレジット、GXリーグ)と東南アジアへの投資戦略に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to the global discourse on carbon markets and foreign investment by highlighting the legal uncertainties in host countries. It is relevant for international investors and policymakers working on carbon credit frameworks under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Highlights legal challenges in carbon credit investment frameworks.
🏢実務担当者:Provides warning about legal risks when investing in carbon credits in Indonesia.
🏛政策担当者:Underlines the urgency of regulatory clarification for carbon assets to attract foreign investment.
📄 Abstract(原文)
The green economic transition introduces carbon credits as foreign direct investment objects. However, the Indonesian investment law regime suffers from a severe normative vacuum due to the absence of carbon credit qualifications as intangible assets. This doctrinal research is operationalized utilizing statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches to untangle this legal standing issue. The results demonstrate that the lack of property rights recognition over carbon assets triggers significant legal uncertainty for foreign investors. This condition creates high risks regarding indirect expropriation threats without compensation and severe ambiguity in cross-border capital repatriation procedures. The systemic implications of this regulatory dissonance directly place Indonesian jurisdiction in a vulnerable position against international arbitration dispute threats. Foreign tribunals possess potential to interpret these entities as legitimate protected assets. Conclusively, filling the legal vacuum through statutory requalification of carbon units as investment objects constitutes an absolute urgency to guarantee investment certainty while mitigating state jurisdictional losses.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.65101/jspp.v1i3.405first seen 2026-06-17 05:42:57 · last seen 2026-06-17 07:14:00
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。