気候変動と国際仲裁：紛争解決から気候ガバナンスへ
Climate Change and International Arbitration: From Dispute Resolution to Climate Governance (原題)
Dr.Tala Zein
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本稿は、再生可能エネルギー投資、サステナビリティ・リンク契約、炭素市場、環境規制などから生じる気候関連紛争の増加を背景に、国際仲裁の役割が変容していると論じる。仲裁はもはや私的な商業・投資紛争解決の枠を超え、気候関連義務の履行を促しエネルギー転移期の規制の予見可能性を支える「気候ガバナンスの手段」へと進化しつつある。一方で透明性、公的参加、判断の一貫性、当事者自治と公益の調整といった課題も残ると指摘する。
English
This article argues that climate change is transforming international arbitration from a private dispute-resolution mechanism into an instrument of climate governance. It examines disputes arising from renewable energy investment, sustainability-linked contracts, carbon markets, and environmental regulation, and assesses arbitration's advantages alongside concerns over transparency, public participation, consistency, and the balance between party autonomy and public environmental interests.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本企業が再生可能エネルギー投資やサステナビリティ・リンク契約に関与する際、紛争リスクと仲裁条項の設計は実務上の論点となる。SSBJ開示や移行金融の文脈でも、規制の予見可能性と契約実務の接点として参考になる。
In the global GX context
As ISSB/CSRD-driven disclosure expands and transition finance grows, climate-related disputes over green investments and sustainability-linked instruments are rising. This paper maps how arbitration may fill governance gaps where regulation and courts lag, relevant to global debates on climate accountability and investor-state relations.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:気候ガバナンスにおける仲裁の機能変化を法理論的に整理する視点を提供する。
🏢実務担当者:再エネ投資やサステナビリティ・リンク契約における仲裁条項・紛争リスク管理の検討材料になる。
🏛政策担当者:気候関連紛争の増加に伴い、仲裁の透明性・一貫性と公益調整の制度的課題を認識すべき。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Climate change has emerged as one of the defining legal and economic challenges of the twenty-first century, generating an increasingly diverse range of disputes arising from renewable energy investments, sustainability-linked contracts, carbon markets, environmental regulation, and the global transition toward a low-carbon economy. These disputes are transnational and involve a complex interaction between private commercial interests and public environmental objectives, challenging traditional mechanisms of dispute resolution. In this context, international arbitration has assumed an increasingly significant role due to its neutrality, procedural flexibility, technical expertise, and the global enforceability of arbitral awards. This article argues that climate change is fundamentally reshaping the function of international arbitration. Rather than serving solely as a private mechanism for resolving commercial and investment disputes, arbitration is progressively evolving into an instrument of climate governance capable of facilitating the implementation of climate-related obligations and supporting regulatory certainty during the global energy transition. While arbitration offers distinct advantages for addressing transnational climate disputes, its expanding role also raises important questions concerning transparency, public participation, consistency of arbitral awards, and the reconciliation of party autonomy with broader public interests, including environmental protection and climate justice. Through a critical synthesis of recent scholarship and developments in commercial, investment, and state-related arbitration, this article examines both the opportunities and the limitations of climate arbitration. It concludes that the future legitimacy and effectiveness of international arbitration will depend upon its capacity to adapt its procedural and substantive frameworks to the evolving demands of climate governance while preserving its core principles of neutrality, efficiency, and enforceability.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.59543/jidmis.v3.2081first seen 2026-09-11 04:58:20
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。