エネルギーコミュニティへの参加を理解する：エネルギー市民権とコミュニティ要因の役割
Understanding involvement in energy communities: the role of energy citizenship and community factors (原題)
Lynette A. M. H. Germes, Carina J. Wiekens, Henny van der Windt
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、エネルギー市民権とコミュニティ研究を統合した枠組みで、オランダ北部の2調査データを用い、エネルギーコミュニティ（EC）への実際の参加と参加意欲の規定要因を回帰分析で比較した。実際の参加は参加効力感・社会規範・態度と強く関連し、参加意欲は政府責任への期待と場所への愛着に関連する。参加者は持続可能性・コミュニティ志向を重視し、非参加者はコストや信頼性など実務的要因を重視する。EC促進にはコミュニティ・制度的条件の考慮が重要と示唆する。
English
This study integrates energy citizenship and community research to examine factors linked to involvement in energy communities (ECs), using survey data from two studies in the northern Netherlands. Actual involvement is associated with participative efficacy, social norms, and attitudes, while willingness is linked to expectations of governmental responsibility and place attachment. Involved citizens emphasize sustainability and community aspects, whereas non-involved citizens focus on costs, benefits, and reliability. Findings highlight the need to consider community and institutional conditions when promoting EC involvement.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では地域新電力や市民参加型再エネ事業がGX推進の鍵となるが、本論文は参加意欲と実際の参加の規定要因が異なることを示し、地域エネルギー事業の設計や住民合意形成に示唆を与える。SSBJ・有報の開示文脈とは直接連動しないが、地域脱炭素の社会受容性研究として参考になる。
In the global GX context
Globally, energy communities are central to just transition and decentralized renewable deployment under frameworks like the EU's Clean Energy Package. This paper adds empirical nuance by distinguishing drivers of actual involvement versus willingness, informing community energy policy design and citizen engagement strategies beyond disclosure frameworks.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:エネルギー市民権とコミュニティ参加の規定要因を実証的に区別した点が、社会受容性研究に貢献する。
🏢実務担当者:地域エネルギー事業の住民参加設計において、参加者と非参加者の動機の違いを踏まえた訴求が有効である。
🏛政策担当者:EC促進策では、参加意欲と実際の参加で異なる障壁に対応する制度設計が必要である。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Energy communities (ECs) are collective initiatives in which citizens jointly engage in the production, distribution and storage of renewable energy. Through their involvement in ECs, citizens take responsibility for contributing to the energy transition, often conceptualised as a form of energy citizenship. However, involvement in ECs remains limited, highlighting the need for new perspectives on EC involvement. This study combines insights from energy citizenship and community research within a conceptual framework to examine how citizens' roles in the energy transition and their community context are associated with involvement in ECs. Using quantitative survey data from two complementary exploratory studies conducted in the northern Netherlands, the analysis distinguishes between actual involvement and willingness to become involved. The regression analyses show that involvement and willingness are associated with partly different, yet overlapping, sets of factors. While involvement is more strongly associated with participative efficacy, social norms, and attitudinal factors, willingness is primarily related to expectations regarding governmental responsibility and physical place attachment. Both actual involvement and willingness are associated with a preference for collective rather than individual action and with a willingness to contribute to the local community. Furthermore, clear differences emerge between involved and non-involved citizens in their motivations. Involved citizens tend to emphasise sustainability-related and community-oriented aspects, whereas non-involved citizens place greater emphasis on practical considerations such as costs, perceived benefits, and reliability. These findings provide new insights into the multifaceted nature of energy citizenship and highlight the importance of considering community and institutional conditions when promoting involvement in ECs.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2026.104963first seen 2026-10-02 04:38:56
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。