← 論文一覧に戻る

ACCOUNTING AND ANALYTICAL INFORMATION AS THE INSTITUTIONAL BASIS OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY

知識経済の制度的基盤としての会計・分析情報 (AI 翻訳)

T. Gnatiuk, M. Vasylyuk, Vitalii Shkromyda, L. Sas

INNOVATIVE ECONOMY📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-05-01#開示インフラ
DOI: 10.37332/2309-1533.2026.2.10
原典: https://inneco.org/index.php/innecoen/article/download/1804/1986
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、知識経済における会計・分析情報の制度的基盤としての役割を理論的に考察する。ウクライナの戦後復興を背景に、会計の新たな機能(コード化、保護、伝達)や、環境・社会・人間会計のXBRL/iXBRL統合の必要性を提唱。R&D費用の即時費用処理が知識経済の発展を阻害する制度的罠を指摘する。気候変動開示への直接的な言及はないが、サステナビリティ報告の基盤議論に示唆を与える。

English

This paper theoretically examines accounting and analytical information as an institutional foundation of the knowledge economy, set against Ukraine's post-war recovery. It proposes new accounting functions (codification, protection, transmission) and advocates integrating environmental, social, and human accounting into XBRL/iXBRL formats. It identifies institutional traps in expensing R&D costs that hinder knowledge economy development. While not directly addressing climate disclosure, it offers foundational insights for sustainability reporting infrastructure.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本においては、SSBJや有価証券報告書における非財務情報のXBRL化が進む中、本論文の知見は会計情報の制度設計に示唆を与える。特に、無形資産やESG情報のコード化・保証の議論は、日本の統合報告や投資家対応にも応用可能。ただし、ウクライナの戦後復興という固有文脈が強いため、直接的な適用には注意が必要。

In the global GX context

Globally, this paper contributes to the evolving discourse on non-financial reporting infrastructure, particularly XBRL/iXBRL for ESG data. It aligns with ISSB and CSRD efforts to codify sustainability information. The criticism of R&D expensing as an institutional trap resonates with debates on intangible asset capitalization. The Ukrainian post-war context provides a unique lens on rebuilding accounting systems in crisis settings.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a theoretical framework linking accounting information to knowledge economy and sustainability reporting, useful for scholars studying institutional aspects of ESG disclosure.

🏢実務担当者:Highlights the strategic importance of integrating ESG metrics into XBRL-based reporting and the evolving role of accountants as 'guarantors' of trust in intangible assets.

🏛政策担当者:Suggests regulatory reforms to avoid institutional traps in R&D accounting and to promote capitalization of intellectual and environmental assets within national reporting systems.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Gnatiuk T.M., Vasylyuk M.M., Shkromyda V.V., Sas L.S. ACCOUNTING AND ANALYTICAL INFORMATION AS THE INSTITUTIONAL BASIS OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY Purpose. The aim of the article is the theoretical and methodological substantiation of accounting and analytical information as the structural basis of the knowledge economy, disclosure of its potential in the processes of post-industrial transformation of society, and determination of strategic guidelines for the development of the accounting profession in the context of building a domestic knowledge ecosystem during the post-war recovery of Ukraine. Methodology of research. The institutional and systemic approaches are applied to substantiate accounting and analytical information as the institutional foundation of the knowledge economy. The historical-evolutionary approach and methods of abstraction are used to analyse the development of the accounting subject and to investigate the evolution of the perception of the specialist's professional status as a dominant element of the institute of trust in the knowledge economy. The modelling method, structural-functional approach allowed revealing the newest functions of accounting (codification, protection, transmission), while causal analysis is applied to identify the institutional traps of the current regulatory standards regarding the expensing of research and development (R&D) costs, as well as to assess their impact on the capitalization of the innovative sector. Findings. It is proven that within the coordinates of the knowledge economy, accounting and analytical information transforms from a retrospective report into a key mechanism for generating trust in invisible assets. Its newest functions encompass the codification of tacit knowledge into digital assets, the protection of institutional memory, and the legitimization of the value of intellectual potential. It is established that the classical industrial accounting paradigm, based on the directive expensing of research and development (R&D) costs, creates institutional traps that misinform markets and artificially hinder the development of the knowledge economy. The necessity of integrating environmental, social, and human accounting in the digital XBRL/iXBRL format as an adequate tool for measuring knowledge-based effects is substantiated. It is revealed that the import of global industrial standards without local adaptation generates pseudo-institutional superstructures that distort the value of national intellectual wealth. Originality. The principles of institutional theory have been further developed through the identification of accounting information as an independent institutional basis that structures the space of trust. The evolutionary model of transforming the professional status of the accounting subject in accordance with the challenges of the knowledge economy has been improved. This is achieved through the conceptual substantiation of the inevitable transition to the institute of accounting guarantors, where the guarantor acts as a key architect of trust in the digital representation of intellectual capital, and digital ethics is defined as a new basic regulatory institution of the knowledge society. Practical value. The obtained conclusions and generalizations form the theoretical foundation for developing a national strategy for integrating the domestic financial reporting system into the global knowledge economy and post-industrial environment. The proposed concepts create a basis for the capitalization of business knowledge resources and can be implemented in the infrastructure design processes of Ukraine's future post-war recovery and in training programs for accounting professionals capable of effectively managing intangible assets in the new economic reality. Key words: knowledge economy, accounting and analytical information, institutional theory, intellectual capital, accounting guarantor, digital reporting, knowledge asset, human capital.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。