マルチパーク統合エネルギーシステムの低炭素経済ディスパッチに向けたハイブリッド蓄エネルギー・炭素クォータ共有の協調フレームワーク
A coordinated hybrid energy storage–carbon quota sharing framework for low-carbon economic dispatch of multi-park integrated energy systems (原題)
Wenqiang Tao, Hongkun CHEN, Shiting Cui, Lei Chen
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
複数パーク統合エネルギーシステム（MPIES）の協調運用に向け、電力・水素・炭素クォータ共有（EHCS）フレームワークを提案。炭素クォータを内生の取引可能資源として扱い、炭素ポテンシャル・炭素フローモデルで責任を追跡し、適応的配分と段階的賞罰精算を連動させる。二段階min–max–min協調ディスパッチにNash交渉とADMMを組み込み、経済性・再エネ利用率・炭素責任配分・不確実性への耐性を改善することをケースで示す。
English
Proposes an electricity–hydrogen–carbon quota sharing (EHCS) framework for low-carbon economic dispatch of multi-park integrated energy systems. Carbon quotas become endogenous tradable resources, traced via a carbon-potential–carbon-flow model linked to adaptive allocation and tiered reward–penalty settlement. A two-stage min–max–min cooperative dispatch with Nash bargaining and ADMM handles source–load uncertainty, improving economics, renewable utilization, and carbon-responsibility allocation.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
炭素クォータをパーク間で取引可能な資源として扱う発想は、日本でのScope 3配分やカーボンプライシング設計、地域単位の脱炭素運用を考える際の参考になる。SSBJ開示や有報での炭素責任の帰属議論にも示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Offers a modeling template for allocating and trading carbon responsibility across interconnected facilities, relevant to Scope 3 allocation debates and internal carbon pricing under ISSB/CSRD disclosure regimes. The tracing-and-settlement coupling is a useful reference for global carbon-accounting scholarship.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:炭素責任の追跡と配分をエネルギー最適化に統合する数理モデルの設計例として参考になる。
🏢実務担当者:複数拠点・パーク間での炭素クォータ配分や内部炭素価格の運用設計に応用できる。
🏛政策担当者:地域・産業団地単位での炭素配分・精算制度の設計オプションとして検討材料になる。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Multi-park integrated energy systems (MPIESs) provide an effective platform for renewable-energy accommodation and regional low-carbon operation. However, their coordinated operation remains constrained by insufficient cross-park resource sharing, disconnected energy and carbon management, and limited adaptability to source–load uncertainty. To address these issues, this study proposes an electricity–hydrogen–carbon quota sharing (EHCS) framework for low-carbon economic dispatch of MPIESs. The principal contribution lies in establishing a closed-loop coupling relationship among multi-energy sharing, carbon-responsibility tracing, carbon-quota allocation, and market settlement. First, electricity, hydrogen, and carbon quotas are coordinated through shared electricity storage, shared hydrogen storage, and a shared carbon system. Carbon quotas are treated as endogenous tradable resources whose surplus or deficit changes with energy conversion, storage operation, and inter-IES transactions. Second, a carbon-potential–carbon-flow model is developed by integrating energy tracing, nodal carbon-potential propagation, and intertemporal carbon-inventory migration. The resulting carbon responsibility is further linked to adaptive carbon-quota allocation and a tiered reward–penalty settlement mechanism, forming a continuous mapping from energy sources and conversion pathways to quota trading. Finally, the coupled EHCS model is embedded in a two-stage min–max–min cooperative dispatch framework to coordinate first-stage electricity‑hydrogen-carbon interactions and second-stage operational recourse under source–load uncertainty. Nash bargaining and ADMM are employed as established tools to ensure individual rationality, privacy preservation, and distributed coordination among independent participants. Case studies demonstrate that the proposed framework improves economic performance, renewable-energy utilization, carbon-responsibility allocation, and operational resilience of MPIESs.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6221606first seen 2026-10-22 04:51:47 · last seen 2026-11-06 04:49:46
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。