炭素回収技術と再生可能エネルギーシステムの統合：グローバルネットゼロ移行に向けた技術経済・環境・政策の視点
Integration of carbon capture technologies with renewable energy systems: Techno-economic, environmental, and policy perspectives toward global net-zero transition (原題)
Mohammad Alrbai, Sameer Al‐Dahidi, B. Kalidasan, Alaa F. Farhan, Miral Alshriadeh, Sara Kharabsheh, Omar A. Ismail, Osama Ayadi, Jechan Lee
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本レビューは、再生可能エネルギー（RE）で駆動するCCUSシステムの技術・経済・環境・政策・展開の各側面を体系的に評価する。主要なCO2回収手法の効率・エネルギー損失・TRL・コスト・拡張性を定量比較し、集光型太陽熱・太陽光・風力・地熱・廃熱を活用した回収システムを技術的・経済的に検討する。さらにライフサイクルGHG・水・土地利用・バイオマス持続性・社会的受容性を統合し、コスト削減軌道や学習率、再エネ電力価格感度などの商業化経路も提示する。
English
This review systematically assesses renewable-energy-driven CCUS systems across technical, economic, environmental, policy, and deployment dimensions. It quantitatively compares leading CO2 capture methods on efficiency, energy penalty, TRL, cost, and scalability, and evaluates solar thermal, PV, wind, geothermal, and waste-heat-assisted capture. It also integrates lifecycle GHG, water/land use, biomass sustainability, and social acceptance, and outlines commercialization pathways via cost-reduction trajectories, learning rates, and sensitivity to renewable electricity prices.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本はGX推進戦略でCCS/CCUSを重点技術に位置づけ、再エネ拡大と組み合わせた脱炭素電源・産業プロセスの設計が課題。本レビューは再エネ電力価格感度や学習率に触れ、日本企業のCCUS投資判断や政策設計に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Globally, CCUS is a key pillar of net-zero pathways under ISSB/TCFD transition planning, yet its economics hinge on renewable electricity prices and learning rates. This review offers a comparative, sustainability-inclusive framework that can inform transition finance and disclosure of CCUS project viability.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:再エネ統合CCUSの技術経済・持続性評価の比較枠組みと研究ギャップを整理する。
🏢実務担当者:CCUS導入検討時に再エネ電力価格・学習率・水/土地利用を含むコスト感度を把握できる。
🏛政策担当者:CCUSと再エネの統合政策設計や商業化支援策の根拠として活用できる。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Existing Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) technologies remains, constrained owing to higher energy consumption, peak coast of operation and fossil fuel dependence which restricts there economic and environmental benefits. Subsequently, the rapid expansion of renewable energy (RE) technologies offers wide opportunity for decarbonize carbon capture processes with long term economic stability and system sustainability. Despite the existence of numerous review articles analysing individual carbon capture technologies or certain facets of CCUS, a comprehensive evaluation of renewable-energy-driven carbon capture systems that includes technological, economic, sustainability, policy, and deployment aspects is still missing. This review bridges the existing gaps by providing a thorough and systematic assessment of technologies for carbon capture, utilization, and storage powered by RE. It provides an analysis of the leading CO 2 capture methods and carries out quantitative comparisons of their capture efficiency, energy penalty, technology readiness, cost (capital and operational costs) and scalability. It mainly focused on the integration between renewable energy sources and carbon capture. The applications of concentrated solar thermal energy, photovoltaics, wind energy, geothermal and waste heat assisted CO 2 capture systems are systematically assessed, both from technical and economical points of view. Lastly, the review also assesses lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions, water and land use impacts, the sustainability of biomass uses for CCUS and social acceptability for different technologies to develop a holistic picture of sustainability of renewable-driven CCUS systems. Finally, to envisage future commercialisation pathways several important techno-economic analyses such as those on cost reduction trajectories, learning rates and sensitivity to renewables electricity price are outlined.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2026.103581first seen 2026-09-28 05:20:21
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。