再生可能エネルギー・原子力政策への満足度に対する科学主義の影響：差異的メカニズムと非線形関係の検証
The Effect of Scientism on Satisfaction with Renewable and Nuclear Energy Policies: Verification of Differential Mechanisms and Non-Linear Relationships (原題)
Seungmin Moon
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
市民の科学主義的信念が再エネ・原子力拡大政策への満足度に与える影響を、差異的・非線形に検証した研究。再エネ政策では科学主義の効果は有意でなく、NEP等の生態的価値が正の効果を持つ。原子力政策では科学主義と満足度に逆U字の非線形関係が示唆され、信念が過度になると認知的不協和で満足度が低下する。政策広報は技術的整合性の強調ではなく現実的期待管理とエネルギー源別の対話設計が重要と論じる。
English
This study examines how citizens' scientism beliefs differentially and non-linearly affect satisfaction with renewable and nuclear energy expansion policies. Scientism had no significant effect on renewable policy satisfaction, where ecological values (NEP) mattered positively; for nuclear, a marginally significant inverted-U relationship emerged, with satisfaction rising then falling as scientism becomes extreme due to cognitive dissonance. The authors urge policymakers to move beyond engineering-focused PR toward realistic expectation management and source-specific communication.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本のGX政策（GX推進法・エネルギー基本計画・原子力再稼働と再エネ拡大の同時 pursuit）における国民合意形成と広報戦略を考える上で、科学技術偏重の説明が市民受容に限界を持つことを示す示唆となる。SSBJ開示とは直接関係しないが、政策コミュニケーション設計の参考になる。
In the global GX context
Amid global debates over nuclear revival and renewable build-out under net-zero pathways, this paper adds public-acceptance evidence that technical framing alone does not secure legitimacy, relevant to just-transition and energy-policy communication scholarship beyond disclosure frameworks.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:科学主義・環境価値とエネルギー政策受容の非線形メカニズムを実証的に捉える枠組みとして参照できる。
🏢実務担当者:再エネ・原子力関連事業の対外コミュニケーションで、技術的正当性だけでなく市民の価値・期待管理に配慮する必要性を示す。
🏛政策担当者:エネルギー政策広報を工学的一元論から脱し、エネルギー源別の期待管理と対話型コミュニケーションへ転換する根拠となる。
📄 Abstract（原文）
This study aims to examine the differential and non-linear effects of citizens’ scientism beliefs on their policy satisfaction regarding the expansion of renewable and nuclear energy. The analysis revealed that while scientism beliefs did not have a statistically significant effect on satisfaction with renewable energy expansion policies, ecological values such as the New Ecological Paradigm (NEP) showed a positive effect. This implies that citizens accept renewable energy policies not as a high-level technical task, but as a domain of realizing ecological values that emphasize climate change response and coexistence with nature. Conversely, a marginally significant inverted U-shaped non-linear relationship was identified between scientism beliefs and satisfaction with nuclear energy expansion policies. That is, while scientism orientation increases policy satisfaction up to a certain level through the utility of nuclear technology and trust in experts, exceeding the threshold where this belief becomes extreme leads individuals to experience cognitive dissonance (negative disconfirmation) in the politically charged policy implementation process, causing satisfaction to shift downward. These results suggest that when establishing national energy transition policies, policymakers must move away from one-dimensional PR that only emphasizes engineering integrity, and instead implement essential strategies such as “realistic expectation management”—proactively communicating through official media channels that conflict resolution processes are inevitable—alongside tailored communication strategies for each energy source.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.26847/mspa.2026.36.3.103first seen 2026-10-26 04:40:54 · last seen 2026-10-30 04:42:01
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。