Funding the future: understanding public spending preferences on the green transition and digitalization in advanced democracies
未来への資金調達：先進民主主義国におけるグリーン移行とデジタル化への公的支出選好の理解 (AI 翻訳)
Sophia Stutzmann, Sebastian Koos
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、グリーン移行とデジタル化への公的支出に対する市民の選好を調査し、雇用リスク認識が選好に与える影響を分析。6か国の比較調査データから、個人は雇用脅威と認識する移行への投資を減らす傾向があり、両方の脅威を感じる場合には均等配分に近づくことを示した。
English
This paper examines citizens' preferences for public spending on the green transition versus digitalization, focusing on perceived labor market risks. Using comparative survey data from six countries, it finds that individuals prefer to reduce spending on the transition they see as a job threat, while those feeling threatened by both lean toward equal investment.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でもグリーン移行とデジタル化の同時推進が課題となる中、市民の選好を理解する本調査は、政策コミュニケーションや国民理解醸成に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
This study provides comparative evidence on citizen preferences for green transition funding, relevant for policymakers balancing digital and green investments in the context of just transition discussions.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Political economy scholars studying public opinion on green transition funding and trade-offs.
🏢実務担当者:Government strategy teams designing public communication and investment plans for the green transition.
🏛政策担当者:Officials balancing budgets between green and digital transitions, needing to anticipate public support.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Abstract The twin digital and green transition constitutes a major societal challenge in the upcoming decades. To remain competitive, governments need to invest in both transformations. However, budgetary limits constitute trade-offs in addressing both simultaneously. At the same time, both transformations have far-reaching consequences for labor markets. Yet, we know very little about citizens’ preferences for relative public spending on both transitions and their determinants. Here, we examine the role of subjective labor market risk resulting from these transitions in shaping relative spending preferences. We argue that individuals might prefer to spend less on the societal transformation they perceive as a job threat (single-pressuredness), while cross-pressuredness by both transitions leads to an equal split. Drawing on novel comparative survey data from six countries, we find that individuals prefer to divert investment from the transition they perceive as a threat to their jobs, while cross-pressuredness moves people slightly towards equal investment.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x26101172first seen 2026-06-17 04:45:05 · last seen 2026-06-17 07:07:10
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。