Exploring nature-based solutions’ effectiveness indicators for climate change adaptation: a systematic review
気候変動適応のための自然を基盤とした解決策の有効性指標の探求：系統的レビュー (AI 翻訳)
Fabienne Horneman, S. Torresan, E. Furlan, A. Critto
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本系統的レビューは、気候変動適応における自然を基盤とした解決策（NBS）の有効性指標を分析し、2008年から2023年の27論文（36事例研究）を検討した。プロセスベースのパフォーマンス指標（51.9%）とインパクト指標（70.4%）が多く用いられる一方、社会経済的要因が軽視されていることが明らかになった。より広範な社会経済指標と高度なデータ手法を組み込んだ入れ子型アプローチが推奨される。
English
This systematic review examines effectiveness indicators for nature-based solutions in climate change adaptation, analyzing 27 articles (36 case studies) from 2008-2023. It finds reliance on process-based performance indicators (51.9%) and impact indicators (70.4%) while socio-economic factors are often neglected. The study recommends a nested performance-centric approach with broader socio-economic indicators and advanced modeling.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では国土強靭化計画や気候変動適応計画でNBSの活用が期待されるが、評価指標の標準化が課題。本レビューは、自治体や事業者がNBS効果を定量的に評価する際の指標選定に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Globally, this review addresses a critical gap in standardized evaluation of nature-based solutions for climate adaptation, relevant to EU NBS agenda and Sendai Framework. It highlights the need for socio-economic indicators, often overlooked in current NBS monitoring.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Systematic review identifies key performance and impact indicators for NBS effectiveness, providing a foundation for indicator selection in future studies.
🏢実務担当者:Offers a comprehensive set of indicators (carbon sequestration, erosion reduction, flood reduction, water quality) and guidance to include socio-economic factors in NBS monitoring.
🏛政策担当者:Supports the development of standardized NBS evaluation frameworks for climate adaptation policies.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Nature-Based Solutions (NBSs) are increasingly incorporated for climate change adaptation and risk reduction, yet the lack of a standardized evaluation framework and definitions hinder the accurate assessment of their effectiveness. This systematic review, covering articles published between 2008 to 2023 obtained through Scopus, aims to bolster NBS applicability by focusing on effectiveness indicators and evaluation methods used within a wide array of case studies where NBS influence climate adaptation through ecosystem service provisioning. The 27 analyzed key articles include a diverse range of coastal NBSs, including 36 case studies, often implemented at the micro- or meso-scale, each designed to address facets of climate adaptation through the provisioning of ecosystem services such as carbon sequestration (n = 16), erosion reduction (n = 11), flood reduction (n = 16), or improvement of water quality (n = 15). The review revealed a prevalent reliance on process-based performance indicators (51.9%) often applied without accounting for synergies and trade-offs, and/or incorporating impact indicators (70.4%) that assess changes in environmental conditions in order to evaluate NBSs’ effectiveness. Monitoring focused primarily on environmental, hydrological, climatic, and biological performance and impact indicators, while frequently neglecting socio-economic factors. A shift towards a nested, performance-centric approach that incorporates a broader range of socio-economic impact indicators and expands spatio-temporal scales could enhance NBSs adoption. Utilizing advanced data techniques and modelling indicators can further strengthen the evidence base and facilitate the adoption of NBSs for climate adaptation.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2025.1603919first seen 2026-06-29 08:33:14
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。