BU234|p^w Audit Template for Energy System Switching under B_U B_U 体系下能源系统切换 p^w 审计模板:化石到可再生、集中式到分布式案例研究

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

🔬研究者:Provides a novel audit framework for evaluating energy transition pathways, integrating technical, social, and policy factors.

🏢実務担当者:Offers a practical template for companies to assess the feasibility and risks of their energy transition plans, supporting credible disclosure.

🏛政策担当者:Suggests a structured method to evaluate transition policies, ensuring they account for friction and residuals to avoid greenwashing.

BU234 establishes p^w Audit Template for Energy System Switching under B_U as an executable audit interface for evaluating energy-transition pathways. It converts the ontology of energy-system regime switching from BU233 into a practical template for judging whether a transition path π can move from fossil-dominant to renewable-dominant energy, and from centralized generation-grid architecture to distributed, storage-supported, demand-responsive energy architecture, while preserving positive energy standing. The file does not judge whether an energy-transition slogan is morally attractive or politically fashionable. It judges whether the proposed pathway remains source-axis anchored, friction-accountable, residual-auditable, weakly persistent, and standing-positive after contact with real infrastructure, real employment structures, real grid stability, real policy constraints, and real user behavior. The guiding proposition is that an energy transition becomes admissible only when long-horizon gains in sustainability, security, affordability, resilience, and environmental carrying capacity exceed the combined burden of C_fric and rank_Xi_res. BU234 therefore targets the “green-transition illusion”: a path may look decarbonized or decentralized at the visible layer while the underlying energy standing deteriorates. The file locks the audit boundary around energy carrier structure, switching friction, residual stratification, weak persistence, and energy standing. It does not replace engineering simulation, grid-dispatch studies, environmental assessment, employment policy, or political negotiation; instead, it provides a common settlement grammar for integrating those domains. The template, BU-ES-pw01, contains five main gates. The first gate is Source-Axis Anchoring: the transition must be anchored in real energy carriers such as physical infrastructure, stable supply, dispatchability, storage reserve, grid inertia or substitute control capacity, regional resources, operational expertise, and emergency fallback. A policy target may guide direction, but it cannot replace SourceAxis proof. The second gate is Weak Persistence p^w: the path must support staged retirement, hybrid coexistence, transitional redundancy, fallback capacity, and controlled operation while preserving global energy standing. This gate rejects both fossil lock-in and reckless replacement. The third gate is Friction Cost C_fric, which measures the real price of transition: fossil-asset retirement, grid reconstruction, storage buildout, workforce retraining, tariff redesign, regulatory adjustment, stranded supply-chain conversion, local resistance, and multi-agent coordination. The fourth gate is Residual Stratification Xi_res, covering technical compatibility residuals, employment and social residuals, policy path-dependence residuals, environmental rebound residuals, and energy-security residuals. These residuals are not rhetorical objections; they are settlement burdens. The fifth gate is the Energy Standing Judgment, expressed as: standing_E(π) = Δ(Sustainability + Security + Affordability + Resilience) − C_fric^E(π) − rank_Xi_res^E(π). A high-standing path is recommended, a zero or negative-standing path is rejected, and a high-potential but high-friction path is conditionally accepted only after weak-persistent redesign. The file’s case study contrasts an aggressive fossil-to-renewable and centralized-to-distributed transition with a p^w hybrid path. The aggressive path may outrun grid, storage, labor, and regional absorption capacity, causing decarbonization potential to be swallowed by friction and residuals. The p^w hybrid path stages fossil retirement, synchronizes renewable expansion with grid reinforcement, prices storage explicitly, funds residual absorption, and introduces distributed resources through validated pilots. The final thesis is direct: BU234 is not anti-transition; it is anti-unsettled transition. Energy transition gains standing only when direction, infrastructure, labor, storage, grid capacity, policy, behavior, residuals, and weak continuity can clear accounts on the same settlement surface.

• openalex https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21066789first seen 2026-07-21 04:52:57