Methodologising the Realization of Blue Carbon Justice within Ecosystem Services Schemes under Indonesia’s Constitutional Frameworks
インドネシア憲法枠組みにおけるブルーカーボン正義の方法論化 (AI 翻訳)
Youla Olva Aguw, Deasy Soeikromo, Arafat Hossain
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
ブルーカーボン保存を気候緩和戦略に組み込む際、分配的正義の不平等を悪化させる可能性がある。本研究はインドネシア憲法に基づくブルーカーボン正義の方法論を設計し、ベトナムとマダガスカルの比較分析から、持続可能な商品認証と任意炭素市場を通じたPESモデルを提案する。結果として、補償とインセンティブの二つのスキームからなるハイブリッドモデルを提示する。
English
This paper addresses the regulatory vacuum for blue carbon in Indonesia and proposes a methodology for blue carbon justice within ecosystem services. Through a comparative study of Vietnam and Madagascar, it recommends a hybrid model of payment for ecosystem services (PES) using sustainable commodity certification and voluntary carbon markets, aiming to ensure ecological and economic rights under Indonesia's constitutional framework.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
インドネシアのブルーカーボン政策における正義の概念を憲法枠組みから検討。日本ではブルーカーボン市場の整備が進んでおり、本論文のPESモデルや二重制度設計は日本の沿岸生態系サービス制度に示唆を与える可能性がある。
In the global GX context
While focused on Indonesia, the paper's hybrid PES model and justice framework are relevant to global blue carbon governance and carbon market design, especially for countries with large coastal carbon stocks seeking to integrate equity into climate mitigation.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a legal methodology for blue carbon justice that can be applied in other national contexts.
🏢実務担当者:Offers a blueprint for designing PES schemes with justice considerations for coastal carbon projects.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need for explicit justice parameters in blue carbon regulation and suggests hybrid incentive mechanisms.
📄 Abstract（原文）
The absence of a lex specialis regulatory framework on blue carbon, notwithstanding Indonesia’s abundant coastal carbon stocks, has resulted in a regulatory vacuum concerning mechanisms for assessing both ecological and economic justice for the environment and affected communities. In the absence of a rigid regulatory formulation, the integration of blue carbon conservation into climate mitigation strategies and carbon trading schemes risks exacerbating distributive justice inequalities rather than alleviating them. This research aims to design a blue carbon justice methodology within an ecosystem services framework grounded in principles of justice under Indonesia’s constitutional framework. The research adopts a normative legal methodology, employing a statutory approach to environmental legislation, complemented by a comparative study of Vietnam and Madagascar to identify models of payment for ecosystem services (PES). The findings show, first, the absence of explicit ‘justice’ parameters within the Indonesian Constitution. Second, lessons drawn from global practices, as well as from Vietnam and Madagascar, indicate an ideal model of blue carbon conservation PES implemented through sustainable commodity certification and voluntary carbon market schemes. Third, the analysis of legal gaps and comparative findings provides a basis for policy recommendations on ecosystem services in Indonesia through a hybrid blue carbon ecosystem services model consisting of two schemes: (1) compensation and (2) incentives. Thus, the establishment of PES mechanisms as an implementation of the ecological fiscal transfer principle is expected to ensure the ecological and economic rights of relevant actors as enshrined within Indonesia’s constitutional framework.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.62264/jlej.v4i2.214first seen 2026-06-07 04:43:58
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。