Mapping ISO Standards for Climate Action: Identifying Trends and Gaps from Monitoring to Mitigation
気候行動のためのISO規格マッピング：監視から緩和までの傾向とギャップの特定 (AI 翻訳)
Martino Oliboni, Giampaolo Oliviero, Anna Mazzi
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、企業の気候中立達成を支援するISO規格の利用可能性を体系的にレビューした。PRISMA手法に基づき2015年～2025年のISO規格を対象に分析した結果、43件の規格が抽出され、主にISO/TC 207および265で開発され、計測・報告に関する規格は豊富だが、緩和策に関する国際ガイダンスは限定的であることが判明した。
English
This study systematically reviews ISO standards supporting corporate climate neutrality. Using PRISMA, it analyzes standards from 2015-2025 with keywords on carbon capture, footprint, storage, and greenhouse gases. 43 standards were identified, mostly from ISO/TC 207 and 265, revealing an abundance of measurement/reporting standards but a gap in mitigation guidance.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではSSBJや有報での気候関連開示が進む中、ISO規格は実務での参照基準として重要。本分析は日本企業が活用すべき規格の全体像と不足分野を示しており、開示対応や緩和策の検討に有用。
In the global GX context
Globally, ISO standards underpin many climate disclosure frameworks (e.g., ISSB references). This mapping highlights the current focus on monitoring/reporting and the lack of mitigation standards, which is critical for aligning standards with the IPCC's mitigation strategies and filling the gap for practical guidance.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a systematic overview of existing ISO climate standards and identifies research gaps, particularly the lack of mitigation-focused standards.
🏢実務担当者:Helps corporate sustainability teams identify which ISO standards are available for carbon accounting and reporting, and flags the need for more guidance on mitigation measures.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the imbalance in ISO standards between monitoring and mitigation, suggesting that policymakers should encourage development of mitigation-related international standards.
📄 Abstract（原文）
This study analyses the availability of ISO standards to support companies in achieving climate neutrality. A systematic review, conducted in accordance with the PRISMA methodology, examined ISO standards published between 2015 and April 2025 containing at least one of the four keywords in the title or abstract: carbon capture, carbon footprint, carbon storage and greenhouse gas. The analysis selected 43 documents, developed mainly by the ISO Technical Committees 207 and 265, highlighting growing interest in the topic in recent years. The standards identified are primarily related to Target 13.2 of the 2030 Agenda, concerning the integration of climate change measures into national strategies and policies. Support for the other targets of Sustainable Development Goal 13 is limited or absent. Furthermore, the standards mainly support the monitoring and evaluation strategy defined by the IPCC: the analysis reveals an abundance of standards related to measurement and reporting, while international guidance dedicated to mitigation measures remains limited.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3390/green1010004first seen 2026-07-02 05:09:12
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。