気候変動時代における森林生態系と持続可能な管理
Forest Ecosystems and Sustainable Management in the Era of Climate Change (原題)
Dong-Gill Kim
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
気候変動下の持続可能な森林管理は、既存生態系の保全・劣化林の回復・環境変化に応じた適応的管理を要する。森林面積や樹木成長だけでは成功指標として不十分で、生物多様性・土壌・水調整・地域住民も維持すべきとする。干ばつ・火災・病虫害・土地利用圧の相互作用で炭素貯留の予測性は低下し、対応は森林類型や撹乱履歴に応じた条件付きのポートフォリオとなる。
English
Sustainable forest management under climate change requires protecting existing ecological assets, restoring degraded forests, and adaptive management as conditions shift. Forest area and tree growth alone are inadequate success metrics; biodiversity, soils, water regulation, and forest-dependent people must also be sustained. Drought, fire, pests, and land-use pressures interact, making carbon storage less predictable, so responses must be tailored to forest type and disturbance history with explicit attention to uncertainty.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
森林吸収源は日本のGX推進・カーボンニュートラル戦略やJ-クレジット制度の根幹だが、本稿は面積・成長量偏重への警鐘であり、吸収量算定や自然資本開示を検討する国内実務者に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Forest carbon sinks underpin national net-zero targets and nature-related disclosure (TNFD), yet this review cautions against equating forest area or growth with climate benefit—relevant to how ISSB/TNFD reporting frames removals versus gross emissions.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:森林炭素吸収と適応管理の条件付きエビデンスを整理する枠組みとして参照できる。
🏢実務担当者:自然資本・森林関連の開示で面積や成長量を成果指標としない注意点を得られる。
🏛政策担当者:森林吸収源政策で地域差・不確実性を織り込んだ長期モニタリング設計の必要性を確認できる。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Sustainable forest management under climate change requires protection of existing ecological assets, recovery of degraded forests, and management that can adjust as environmental conditions change. Forest area and tree growth alone are inadequate measures of success. Management must also sustain biodiversity, soils, water regulation, and the people who depend on forests. The literature supports a portfolio of responses tailored to forest type, disturbance history, and local objectives, with explicit attention to uncertainty and competing demands. Climate change affects forests through physiological stress, altered regeneration, and changes in disturbance regimes. Drought, fire, pests, and land-use pressures can interact, making forest recovery and carbon storage less predictable. Nevertheless, responses differ among regions, and global averages can conceal both deterioration and recovery. Forest carbon uptake remains substantial, but it should not be confused with the net climate benefit after deforestation emissions and other effects are considered. The management implications are conditional. Natural regeneration is valuable where recovery processes remain functional; planting and other interventions become more important where those processes are constrained. Fuel treatments can reduce subsequent wildfire severity in particular forest systems, but evidence from those systems does not justify indiscriminate treatment elsewhere. Community involvement can improve outcomes, yet participation alone does not guarantee equitable benefits. Decisions therefore need ecological diagnosis, secure and legitimate governance, long-term monitoring, and revision when outcomes diverge from expectations.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23265182first seen 2026-10-30 04:44:57 · last seen 2026-11-06 04:35:07
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。