Life-Cycle Carbon Emission Calculation and Economic Analysis of Zero-Carbon Buildings: A Case Study in China
ゼロカーボン建築のライフサイクル炭素排出量算定と経済性分析:中国の事例研究 (AI 翻訳)
Yizhou Jiang, Cun Wei, Yuanwei Ding, Kaiying Liu, Qunshan Lu, Zhigang Zhou
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、LCA手法を用いてゼロカーボン建築のライフサイクル炭素排出量を算定し、中国済南のゼロカーボン運営センターを事例に、各段階の排出量と主要因を特定した。運用段階と建材生産段階が全体の99%以上を占め、経済分析では、太陽光発電システムの導入がグリーン電力購入よりも年間コストで34.67%~13.71%安いことを示した。この結果は、ゼロカーボン建築の計画・設計における経済的判断の基礎を提供する。
English
This study uses LCA to calculate life-cycle carbon emissions of zero-carbon buildings, taking the Jinan Zero-Carbon Operation Center as a case. It identifies operation and building material production as core stages (99%+ of total emissions). Economic analysis shows that installing photovoltaic systems yields equivalent annual cost savings of 34.67% to 13.71% compared to purchasing green electricity for achieving operation and life-cycle zero-carbon targets. The findings support economic decision-making for zero-carbon building planning.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本の建築分野でもZEB(ネット・ゼロ・エネルギー・ビル)推進が進む中、本論文が示すライフサイクル全体の炭素算定方法とPV導入の経済的有効性は、日本の建築物省エネ基準や補助制度設計に参考となる。特に、運用段階と建材生産段階の排出割合の分析は、日本の建設業界のサプライチェーン排出量算定にも示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Globally, this paper contributes to building decarbonization by providing a detailed life-cycle carbon accounting framework and economic comparison of offset strategies (on-site PV vs. green electricity purchase). The equivalent annual cost methodology offers a replicable tool for buildings in any region. The results favor on-site renewable generation over certificates, which aligns with the growing emphasis on direct emissions reductions in corporate climate strategies.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a systematic LCA method for zero-carbon buildings and a comparative economic analysis framework that can be extended to other building types and regions.
🏢実務担当者:Demonstrates that on-site photovoltaic systems are more cost-effective than purchasing green electricity for achieving zero-carbon building targets, informing capital budgeting and carbon offset decisions.
🏛政策担当者:Offers evidence to support subsidies or incentives for on-site renewable generation in building codes, as it shows long-term cost savings over offsets.
📄 Abstract(原文)
To explore the life-cycle carbon emission characteristics of zero-carbon buildings and the economic feasibility of carbon reduction strategies, this study takes the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) method as the core and constructs a full life-cycle carbon emission accounting system for buildings covering building material production, transportation, construction, operation and demolition in accordance with the standards. Taking the Jinan Zero-Carbon Operation Center Project as a case, this paper systematically calculates its carbon emissions at all stages of the life cycle, identifies the key carbon emission stages and core influencing factors, and comparatively analyzes the economic efficiency of two carbon offset strategies, namely increasing photovoltaic power generation and purchasing green electricity, for the two goals of zero carbon in the operation stage and zero carbon in the full life cycle by using the equivalent annual cost (EAC) method. The results show that the total life-cycle carbon emissions of the case project reach 149,974.04 tCO2e, with the operation stage and building material production stage being the core carbon emission stages, accounting for 75.50% and 24.19% respectively, while the carbon emissions in the transportation, construction and demolition stages account for a negligible proportion. The economic analysis indicates that although the increase in photovoltaic power generation systems involves a high initial investment, its equivalent annual cost is significantly lower than that of the green electricity purchase strategy. Comparative analysis using equivalent annual costs shows that adding a photovoltaic system achieves equivalent annual costs of $206,589.58 and $273,630.84 for operation stage and life-cycle zero-carbon targets, respectively. In contrast, purchasing green power certificates annually to achieve the same goals incurs equivalent annual costs of $316,223.13 and $317,096.45, representing annual savings of 34.67% and 13.71%. The carbon emission accounting method constructed in this study can provide a reference for the life-cycle carbon quantification of zero-carbon buildings, and the conclusions on the economic efficiency of carbon reduction strategies can serve as an economic decision-making basis for the planning, design and carbon reduction scheme selection of zero-carbon buildings.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- crossref https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16122395first seen 2026-06-17 05:57:50
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。