An Analysis of the Role of Fiscal Policy in Controlling CO2 Emissions in the Industrial Sector in Indonesia
インドネシア産業部門におけるCO2排出抑制のための財政政策の役割の分析 (AI 翻訳)
Viola Novaryca, Nayla Desviona, Lizabeth Sari Dewi, Asramid Yasin
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、2010～2023年のインドネシア産業部門のCO2排出に対する財政政策（炭素税、化石燃料補助金、環境・エネルギー関連政府支出）の影響を分析した。排出量は増加傾向にあり、炭素税の実施は限定的で、化石燃料補助金が排出抑制を弱めている。財政政策の一貫性強化が低炭素移行に不可欠である。
English
This study analyzes the impact of fiscal policy (carbon tax, fossil fuel subsidies, and government spending on energy and environment) on industrial CO2 emissions in Indonesia from 2010 to 2023. Emissions increased overall, with carbon tax limited and fossil fuel subsidies weakening emission control. Fiscal policy coherence is essential for low-carbon transition.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でも炭素価格や化石燃料補助金の見直しが議論されており、インドネシアの事例は政策の非一貫性がもたらす課題を示唆する。SSBJ対応や国内のカーボンプライシング設計において、補助金との整合性を考慮する参考となる。
In the global GX context
This Indonesia case study illustrates the tension between carbon pricing and fossil fuel subsidies, a common challenge globally. For developing economies, aligning fiscal instruments is key to effective climate policy. Offers insights for countries like Japan that are reforming energy subsidies alongside carbon pricing.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides empirical evidence on fiscal policy incoherence in an emerging economy's industrial decarbonization.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights the risk of inconsistent policy signals for firms investing in emission reduction in Indonesia.
🏛政策担当者:Underlines the need to phase out fossil fuel subsidies and strengthen carbon pricing for industrial sectors.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Climate change and the growing dependence on fossil fuels have intensified the challenge of aligning Indonesia’s industrial development with its emission reduction commitments. This study analyzes the role of fiscal policy in controlling CO₂ emissions in Indonesia’s industrial sector during the period 2010–2023, with a particular focus on three fiscal instruments: carbon taxation, fossil fuel subsidies, and government expenditure on the energy and environmental sectors. Using a descriptive-analytical approach based on secondary time-series data from national greenhouse gas inventories, state budget documents, government reports, and international energy publications, this study compares the dynamics of industrial CO₂ emissions with the development of fiscal policy instruments. The findings show that industrial CO₂ emissions generally increased throughout the observation period, with a temporary decline during the COVID-19 pandemic and a sharp rebound in 2022–2023. This increase was closely associated with the expansion of energy-intensive industries and the continued reliance on coal-based energy, particularly in manufacturing and mineral processing activities. Fiscal policy has not yet provided a coherent emission-control signal. Carbon tax implementation remained limited and has not directly affected the manufacturing sector, while fossil fuel subsidies continued to create price distortions that weakened incentives for energy efficiency and renewable energy adoption. At the same time, government spending on environmental and renewable energy programs remained relatively small compared with the scale of fossil fuel subsidies. This study concludes that Indonesia’s fiscal policy still operates in two opposing directions: supporting emission reduction through carbon pricing and green expenditure, while simultaneously sustaining carbon-intensive industrial activity through energy subsidies. Strengthening fiscal coherence is therefore essential to align industrial growth with Indonesia’s low-carbon transition agenda.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.59431/ijer.v6i2.803first seen 2026-06-12 04:48:41
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。