Comparative Analysis of Best Available Techniques Reference Documents on the Pulp, Paper, and Board Industry in Korea and the European Union with Respect to Energy Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Management
韓国と欧州連合におけるパルプ・紙・板紙産業のベスト・アベイラブル・テクニック参照文書のエネルギー消費と温室効果ガス管理に関する比較分析 (AI 翻訳)
Narae Yang, Minkyung Kim, Hye Won Lee, Jung Hyun Choi
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、韓国とEUのパルプ・紙産業向けBAT参照文書を比較し、エネルギー管理とGHG対策の差異を分析。EUは工程別で熱・電気を区分管理する一方、韓国は製品別統合方式で工程別指標が不足。カーボンニュートラル達成のため、韓国BATにエネルギー・GHG指標の導入を提言。
English
This study compares Korean and EU Best Available Techniques reference documents for the pulp and paper industry, focusing on energy management and greenhouse gas mitigation. The EU adopts a process-based structure with separate thermal and electrical energy indicators, while Korea uses a product-oriented integrated approach lacking process-specific metrics. It recommends expanding Korean BREF to include energy and GHG indicators to align with carbon neutrality goals and global regulations like CBAM.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でも製紙業界はエネルギー多消費産業であり、工程別のエネルギー・GHG管理の導入はSSBJ対応や温暖化対策計画の策定に有用。本比較分析は、日本がBATを活用した統合環境管理制度を検討する際の参考となる。
In the global GX context
This comparative analysis offers insights for countries like Japan that are strengthening industrial GHG management under ISSB and CBAM. It shows how process-based energy indicators can improve BAT effectiveness, relevant for global disclosure frameworks and transition finance.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a methodology for comparing BAT frameworks across jurisdictions, useful for environmental policy and industrial energy efficiency research.
🏢実務担当者:Demonstrates best practices in energy and GHG management from EU BREFs that can be adapted by Korean pulp and paper facilities facing CBAM compliance.
🏛政策担当者:Offers concrete recommendations for integrating energy and GHG indicators into national BAT systems to meet carbon neutrality targets and avoid carbon leakage.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Abstract : To address the limitations of media-specific environmental management, Korea introduced the integrated Environmental Management System in 2017, with the pulp and paper industry designated in 2020 and integrated permitting process was completed in 2024. With the strengthening of global environmental regulations, such as the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, the importance of greenhouse gas mitigation has increased; however, the dual regulatory structure that separately manages pollutants and greenhouse gases imposes burdens on industrial facilities. This study conducts a comparative analysis of best available techniques reference documents (BREFs) from Korea and the European Union (EU) to propose improvement directions tailored to the Korean pulp and paper industry. The analysis focuses on process classification systems, energy management approaches, BAT, and BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs). The results show that the EU adopts a process-based structure and manages energy by distinguishing between thermal and electrical energy, whereas the Korean BREF employs a product-oriented integrated approach, limiting process-specific energy management. In addition, energy and greenhouse gas indicators are excluded from the current regulatory scope, resulting in a lack of quantitative performance levels for related BAT. To respond to carbon neutrality goals and global regulatory trends, it is necessary to expand the management scope to include energy and greenhouse gas indicators and to establish BAT for greenhouse gas mitigation.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.4491/ksee.2026.48.6.151first seen 2026-07-19 04:47:26
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。