中国における都市・農村家計の炭素排出とその不平等：消費構造の視点から
Urban-rural household carbon emissions and their inequality in China: From the perspective of consumption structure (原題)
Kewen Wang, Chuanglin Fang, Haitao Ma
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
中国の都市・農村家計の炭素排出量（HCE）とその不平等を消費構造の観点から分析した研究。2020年時点で都市部の平均排出量（2.91トン/世帯）が農村部（2.27トン）を上回り、発展・享受志向世帯の排出と格差が生存志向世帯より大きい。農村部と生存志向世帯では所得・消費水準の底上げ不足によりグループ内格差が顕著で、地域別には低排出・高不平等の省が南部、高排出・低不平等の省が北部と東部先進地域に集中する傾向が示された。
English
This study analyzes urban-rural household carbon emissions (HCE) and their inequality in China through consumption structure. Urban average HCE (2.91 t/household) exceeded rural (2.27 t) in 2020, with development/enjoyment-oriented households showing larger emissions and gaps than survival-oriented ones. Rural and survival-oriented households exhibited greater within-group inequality, and provinces clustered into low-emission/high-inequality (south) and high-emission/low-inequality (north/east) patterns.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
中国の家計部門炭素排出と地域間格差の実証分析であり、日本のSSBJ・有報開示や企業のScope 3管理に直接接続する内容ではない。ただし、消費構造と排出格差の関係は、日本国内の地域別脱炭素政策や家計向けカーボンフットプリント施策を検討する際の比較参照材料となり得る。
In the global GX context
While focused on China, this paper contributes to the global discourse on household carbon inequality and just transition, relevant to TCFD/ISSB discussions on Scope 3 and consumption-based emissions. It offers empirical evidence on how consumption structure shapes emissions distribution, informing equitable climate policy design beyond China.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:家計炭素排出の不平等を消費構造から分析する手法と、中国の地域別パターンの実証データを提供する。
🏢実務担当者:消費財・小売業にとって、世帯の消費構造別排出特性を理解する参考になるが、直接的な開示・調達要件への示唆は限定的。
🏛政策担当者:地域間・都市農村間の排出格差を踏まえた公平な脱炭素政策設計の必要性を示唆する。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Reducing household carbon emissions (HCE) and their inequality is a global concern to promote fair environmental sustainability. However, the research on analyzing this issue across urban-rural households with different consumption structures is scarce, also not holistically capturing the association between emissions and inequality. Based on multi-source data, we unveiled the urban-rural HCE and their inequality of China from the perspective of consumption structure. Results indicated that: (a) Urban average HCE (2.91 tons/household) were higher than rural average HCE (2.27 tons/household) in 2020, exhibiting a noticeable urban-rural net gap. With larger consumption volumes and more consumption activities, the HCE and their urban-rural gap of development and enjoyment-oriented (DEO) households outweighed those of survival-oriented (SUO) households. (b) Rural and SUO households demonstrated a more conspicuous within-group inequality in HCE than urban and DEO households, respectively, attributed to a lack of common improvement in residential income and consumption levels. (c) The number of L-H (low emissions and high inequality) and H-L (high emissions and low equality) provinces surpassed that of others, hinting a potential inverse relationship between HCE and their inequality at the regional level. L-H provinces were mainly distributed in the south, while H-L provinces were concentrated in the north and certain eastern developed areas. This study provides important reference for different provinces in China to reduce urban-rural HCE and advance their fair governance in the process of optimizing consumption structure, conducive to facilitating low-carbon and green lifestyles across households.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- primary_source https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2026.104207first seen 2026-10-11 23:54:08
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。