Green Energy Transition
グリーンエネルギー移行 (AI 翻訳)
Alexandra Prodromidou, Faye Ververidou, Evaggelia Zisopoulou
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本報告は西バルカン・東方パートナーシップ諸国（セルビア、ボスニア、コソボ、モルドバ、ウクライナ）におけるグリーンエネルギー移行とエネルギー安全保障・貧困の相互関係を、フォーカスグループ調査に基づき分析。移行は環境問題だけでなく、社会経済・ガバナンス・地政学的課題として認識されていることを示す。
English
This report examines green energy transition, energy security, and poverty in Western Balkan and Eastern Partnership countries through focus groups. It finds that stakeholders perceive transition as a socio-economic, governance, and geopolitical challenge rather than merely environmental, with implications for EU integration and development.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本への直接的な示唆は限定的だが、エネルギー安全保障と脱炭素化の両立という課題は共通。EU周辺国における移行の実態は、日本のエネルギー政策・国際協力の参考になりうる。
In the global GX context
The paper provides qualitative evidence on how EU decarbonisation and energy security dynamics play out in candidate and neighbourhood countries, offering insights for international donors and policymakers addressing just transition in emerging economies.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Useful for comparative studies on energy transition governance and the socio-political dimensions of decarbonisation in non-EU countries.
🏢実務担当者:Development agencies and NGOs can leverage the stakeholder perspectives to design context-sensitive energy transition projects.
🏛政策担当者:EU policymakers and national governments in the region should note the perceived linkage between transition, governance, and European integration.
📄 Abstract（原文）
This report examines the interrelationship between green energy transition, energy security, and energy poverty in selected countries of the Western Balkans (WB) and Eastern Partnership (EaP), namely Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, Moldova, and Ukraine. The analysis is situated within a broader context characterised by the European Union's accelerating decarbonisation agenda, growing concerns over energy security following Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, and ongoing processes of EU enlargement and neighbourhood integration. The report explores how energy transition policies are perceived and implemented in countries facing varying levels of institutional capacity, socio-economic vulnerability, and alignment with EU energy and climate frameworks. The study addresses four interrelated research questions concerning: (a) the socio-economic and governance dimensions of the energy transition; (b) the geopolitical implications of green transformation; (c) the mechanisms through which the EU can support decarbonisation and energy sector reform; and (d) pathways towards enhanced energy security, resilience, and market integration. Drawing on qualitative evidence from ten focus groups involving 75 participants across the five countries, the report captures the perspectives of local and regional public authorities, civil society organisations, and business representatives directly engaged with energy transition processes. The findings demonstrate that energy transition in the specific countries in the WB and EaP is not primarily perceived as an environmental issue alone. Rather, stakeholders understand it as a broader socio-economic, governance, and geopolitical challenge closely linked to questions of development, institutional effectiveness, social justice, and European integration.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21009279first seen 2026-07-19 04:43:13 · last seen 2026-07-19 04:45:13
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。