Defining the Interplay Between Energy Transition Challenges and Biomass Contributions: A Resource, Technology, and Environment Perspective
エネルギー転換の課題とバイオマスの貢献の相互作用の定義：資源、技術、環境の視点から (AI 翻訳)
Electo Eduardo Silva Lora, Manuel Garcı̀a-Pèrez, Edgar Castillo Monroy, Marcelo Risso Errera, Osvaldo José Venturini, Olasunkanmi Opeoluwa Adeoye, Luiz Augusto Horta Nogueira, Rubenildo Viera Andrade, Diego Mauricio Yepes Maya, Diego C. de Oliveira, Angela María Olarte Castillo, Ernesto Carlos Casals Cunill, Carlos Alberto Masip Rodríguez, João Vitor Gonçalves Zuchetto, Yusuf Makarfi Isa, Y X Zhang, А. Н. Козлов, Abdullah Zahid Turan, Elena Gubiy
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本レビューは、気候緩和、エネルギー安全保障、資源利用可能性、技術成熟度の制約を考慮し、バイオマスとバイオエネルギーがエネルギー多様化にどう貢献できるかを検討。バイオマスは化石燃料の万能な代替ではないが、再生可能炭素、調整可能エネルギー、プロセス熱、液体燃料、炭素除去などに独自の価値を持つ。その貢献は、原料ガバナンス、土地・水の保護、物流、肥料投入、技術成熟度、検証されたライフサイクル性能に依存する。地域資源と持続可能性制約に応じた差別化された経路を通じて、バイオエネルギーがエネルギー転換を最も信頼性高く支援できると結論。
English
This integrative review examines how biomass and bioenergy can contribute to energy diversification under constraints of climate mitigation, energy security, resource availability, and technology readiness. It finds that biomass has unique value for renewable carbon, dispatchable energy, process heat, liquid fuels, and carbon removal, but its contributions depend on feedstock governance, land and water safeguards, logistics, technology maturity, and verified life-cycle performance. The study concludes that bioenergy can credibly support the energy transition through differentiated pathways tailored to regional resources and sustainability constraints.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本は化石燃料依存度が高く、バイオマス（木質、農業残渣）の活用が進んでいる。本レビューは、地域資源に応じたバイオエネルギーの差別化経路を提示しており、日本のバイオマス導入戦略やSSBJのスコープ3排出削減に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
This review provides a comprehensive framework for evaluating biomass roles in global energy transitions, relevant to TCFD/ISSB discussions on climate mitigation pathways and transition finance. It emphasizes the need for context-specific strategies, which aligns with international trends toward differentiated decarbonization approaches.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a holistic literature synthesis on biomass contributions to energy transition, highlighting key trade-offs and research gaps.
🏢実務担当者:Offers insights on integrating biomass into corporate sustainability strategies, particularly for hard-to-abate sectors needing renewable carbon and dispatchable energy.
🏛政策担当者:Emphasizes the importance of regional resource governance and differentiated pathways, informing bioenergy policy design and land-use regulation.
📄 Abstract（原文）
This integrative critical review examines how biomass and bioenergy can contribute to energy diversification while accounting for constraints related to climate mitigation, energy security, resource availability, and technology readiness. The review combines a targeted literature synthesis with expert-informed insights from the international seminar Energy Transition and Biofuels held at the Federal University of Itajubá in October 2025. The seminar and COP30-related discussions were used as contextual and conceptual inputs, while peer-reviewed literature, policy documents, and technical reports provided the evidentiary basis for the analysis. The manuscript evaluates biomass and biofuels utilization, refinery integration, sustainable aviation fuels, biochar, BECCS, hydrogen synergies, life-cycle assessment, artificial intelligence, and logistics. The synthesis indicates that biomass is not a universal substitute for fossil fuels. Still, it has distinctive value in applications requiring renewable carbon, dispatchable energy, process heat, liquid fuels, carbon removal, and compatibility with existing infrastructure. The analysis also shows that these contributions are contingent on feedstock governance, land and water safeguards, logistics, fertilizer inputs, technology maturity, and verified life-cycle performance. The food–fuel discussion is therefore reframed as a context-specific problem of land-use, access, productivity, and governance rather than a simple competition between energy and food production. The study concludes that bioenergy can most credibly support the energy transition when deployed through differentiated pathways tailored to regional resources, sustainability constraints, and sector-specific decarbonization requirements.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3390/en19133162first seen 2026-07-06 04:53:49
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。