← 論文一覧に戻る

Economic Modelling of Energy Security of Distributed Power Systems in the Post-Crisis Period: Scenario Analysis and Assessment of Tail Risks

ポスト危機期における分散型電力システムのエネルギー安全保障の経済モデリング:シナリオ分析とテールリスク評価 (AI 翻訳)

Shpak N, Gnylianska L, Gvozd M, Majchrzak M, Zaporozhets A

Research Squareプレプリント2026-07-23#エネルギー転換Origin: EU経営インパクト: コスト削減対象セクター: power
DOI: 10.20944/preprints202607.1709.v1
原典: https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202607.1709.v1

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、地政学的ショックと燃料市場の変動性の高まりの中で、分散型エネルギーシステムのエネルギー安全保障の変容を研究する。従来のコスト最小化アプローチとは異なり、経済効率、信頼性、システムリスク(CVaR)を組み合わせた多基準リスクベース最適化モデルを提案。欧州電力市場データ(2010-2025)に基づくシナリオ分析により、2021年以降の構造変化と燃料ショックの価格伝達弾力性の増大(0.21→0.62)を確認。再生可能エネルギーの導入拡大だけでは安定性を保証できず、エネルギー貯蔵や需要管理などの柔軟性ツールがシステムリスクを最大35%削減することを示した。

English

This paper studies the transformation of energy security of distributed energy systems amid geopolitical shocks and fuel market volatility. It proposes a multi-criteria risk-based optimization model combining economic efficiency, reliability, and systemic risk (CVaR), unlike traditional cost-minimization approaches. Using European electricity market data (2010-2025) and scenario modeling, it confirms a structural break after 2021 with increased fuel shock pass-through elasticity (from 0.21 to 0.62). Results show that increasing renewables alone does not guarantee stability; flexibility tools like energy storage and demand management can reduce systemic risk by up to 35%.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本は化石燃料輸入依存度が高く、エネルギー安全保障とGXの両立が課題。本論文のリスクベースモデルと柔軟性ツールの有効性は、日本の電力系統計画や調整力確保に示唆を与える。また、SSBJ開示においてエネルギーリスク管理の定量化手法として参考になる可能性がある。

In the global GX context

This paper addresses a core global GX challenge: balancing renewable expansion with energy security under volatility. Its findings on fuel shock transmission and the role of flexibility tools (storage, demand response) are directly relevant to ISSB/TCFD disclosures on climate resilience and transition risk. The CVaR-based risk metric offers a quantifiable approach for scenario analysis required by global frameworks.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a risk-based optimization model integrating CVaR and multi-criteria analysis for energy systems, applicable to further research on energy transition and resilience.

🏢実務担当者:Offers a framework for assessing and mitigating systemic risk in distributed power systems, useful for energy companies and utilities planning investments in flexibility assets.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need for policies promoting energy storage and demand management alongside renewables to ensure stability, and provides evidence for risk-based energy security planning.

📄 Abstract(原文)

The paper studies the transformation of energy security of distributed energy systems in the context of growing uncertainty, geopolitical shocks and volatility of fuel markets in order to form theoretical and methodological foundations for increasing the resilience, adaptability and economic efficiency of energy systems in crisis conditions. In contrast to traditional approaches focused mainly on cost minimization, a multi-criteria risk-based optimization model is proposed, combining indicators of economic efficiency (LCOE, CAPEX, OPEX), reliability of the energy system and systemic risk, which is quantified using the notional cost at risk (CVaR). The empirical base of the study is based on the analysis of long-term data of the European electricity market for 2010–2025, supplemented by scenario modelling using simulation and stochastic modelling methods to reproduce exogenous shocks. The results of the analysis confirmed the presence of a structural fracture after 2021, characterized by a transition from a stable mode of operation to a highly volatile state with increased sensitivity of the system to fuel factors. It has been established that the elasticity of the transmission of fuel shocks to electricity prices increases significantly in crisis periods (from 0.21 in 2010–2016 to 0.62 in 2021–2025), which indicates the formation of a fuel-sensitive mode of functioning of energy markets. While increasing the share of renewable energy sources increases the economic efficiency and environmental sustainability of the energy system, it does not guarantee its stability without the introduction of system flexibility tools, such as energy storage and demand management mechanisms. The results of scenario modelling and risk assessment showed that the use of these tools can reduce the level of systemic risk (CVaR) by up to 35% in crisis conditions. In addition, the effect of risk inertia (risk hysteresis) was revealed, which is manifested in the maintenance of an increased level of risk (CVaR = 0.18 in 2024–2025 compared to 0.05 in 2010–2015) even after partial stabilization of the market. This indicates the long-term nature of the impact of crisis shocks on the functioning of energy systems. The obtained results expand scientific approaches to the interpretation of energy security as a dynamic multidimensional category and substantiate the need to transition to risk-based models of energy system management.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。