低炭素都市パイロット政策が住民の健康に与える影響：汚染物質排出とグリーン行動の二重経路
Impact of the Low-Carbon City Pilot Policy on Residents' Health: The Dual Pathways of Pollutant Emissions and Green Behavior (原題)
Xihao Zeng, Ming Ji, Zhiming Mo, Guilin Xu, Xiaoyue Huang
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
中国285都市の2003〜2020年パネルデータを用い、低炭素都市パイロット政策が住民の健康を有意に改善することを示した。効果は汚染物質排出の削減と住民の低炭素行動の誘導という二重経路で発現し、環境監督強度やイノベーション、汚染対策効率が正に調整する。後発パイロット都市では効率が低下し、未発達都市ではコンプライアンス費用が健康投資を圧迫しうる。
English
Using panel data from 285 Chinese cities (2003-2020), this study finds the Low-Carbon City Pilot policy significantly improves residents' health (coefficient 0.0375). Effects operate through dual pathways: reducing pollutant emissions and guiding low-carbon behavior, moderated by environmental supervision, innovation, and pollution-control efficiency. Later pilot cities show declining efficiency, and compliance costs may crowd out health investment in less developed cities.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
中国の低炭素都市政策の社会便益（健康）を定量化した点は、日本の自治体・都市単位の脱炭素政策評価やGX推進における便益算定の参考になる。ただし開示・炭素会計の論点は含まず、日本のSSBJ・有報対応への直接示唆は限定的。
In the global GX context
This adds to the global evidence base on co-benefits of urban decarbonization policy, relevant to how cities justify transition spending. It complements TCFD/ISSB-style disclosure by quantifying public-health returns of climate policy, though it does not engage disclosure frameworks directly.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:都市単位の脱炭素政策の健康コイン便益と二重経路メカニズムを実証した、政策評価研究の参照例。
🏢実務担当者:自治体・企業が脱炭素投資の社会的便益（健康・地域環境）を説明する際の根拠として活用可能。
🏛政策担当者:低炭素都市政策の設計において、環境監督・イノベーション・汚染対策効率の調整効果と地域格差を考慮すべきことを示唆。
📄 Abstract（原文）
The low-carbon city pilot (LCCP) policy plays an important role in promoting green transformation, but evidence on its impact on residents' health remains lacking, especially research identifying its internal and external dual transmission mechanisms. Based on panel data from 285 prefecture-level cities in China from 2003 to 2020, the multiperiod difference-in-difference, mediating and moderating models are used to explore path of LCCP affecting residents' health. The results show that LCCP significantly improves residents' health, with a core coefficient of 0.0375. Output efficiency declines in later pilot cities, and compliance costs in less developed cities may crowd out health investment. Mechanism analysis reveals that LCCP promotes residents' health through the dual paths: reducing pollutant emissions (in air pollution with of -0.18 and solid waste with -0.126) and guiding residents' low-carbon behavior with a coefficient of 0.542. Meanwhile, the moderating effects show that environmental supervision intensity, innovation and pollution control efficiency have positive moderating effect. In addition, heterogeneity analysis indicates that the positive effect of low-carbon economy on residents' health in developing cities in the west is smaller than that in developed cities in the east, and that of non-capital cities is more significant. Therefore, the dual paths and multiple moderating effects discovered in this study provide empirical evidence for evaluating the public health value of LCCP. Future research may adopt micro survey data to expand heterogeneity analysis and carry out interdisciplinary studies combining environmental economics and public health.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.30955/gnj.07993first seen 2026-09-18 04:42:25
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。